I can't recall any off the top of my head. That was kind of the point in asking for you to provide some examples.
And your posts point out the very reason I asked; there is no point in attempting a discussion (I use that term in jest, as that is not even close to the display almost always seen on these threads in the name of "debate") with people who dismiss everything posted out of hand.
Your opinions are that the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions than the ones your and those in your "ping list/group" (i.e., FR evolutionarians) hold, are NOT CREDIBLE.
It's truly amazing....I've never seen such a consensus of opinion in the real world, science or otherwise.
I require that empirical evidence be present in order to qualify an assertion as credible. Please correct me by citing one of these hundreds of names/links that meet this criteria.
It seems you are relying on past dismissals of unsupported arguments to avoid presenting one that should be considered. I charge that you are using this dodge because you have no basis for your claim.