Posted on 11/20/2005 9:27:40 AM PST by restornu
Didn't you ever see 'The Fly'?
There are no dissenting theories. Perhaps you are unaware of the meaning of the word "theory"? Hint: it requires evidence.
Of course. There are always dissenting beliefs. But until those beliefs can be expresses in scientific terms, until they can become hypotheses, they don't count. That's the way science works - not all notions are equal.
Once again, where are "the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions" that don't rely on creationism or pseudo-science?
As I previously posted to another poster, I do not have at my recall examples for the various instances wherein I saw or read articles or scientists names to which I refer. Seeing as how I have no interest in debating my viewpoints concerning evolution, for reasons previously stated, I am also unwilling to go back through years worths of threads and scan the internet to find any such examples, as well.
As I previously posted to another poster, I do not have at my recall examples for the various instances wherein I saw or read articles or scientists names to which I refer.
So your statement that there are "HUNDREDS" was... a wild guess?
I am also unwilling to go back through years worths of threads and scan the internet to find any such examples, as well.
I get it.
You'll make a bold statement about some conspiracy to supress competing theories, but you can't list even one single solitary theory that is being oppressed.
That tells us all we need to know about you. Thanks.
I did do a search on the subject of scientific journals refusing to publish counter-evolutionary articles...lots of things did come up, way too many for me to read now, what with the Thanksgiving rush coming upon us(at least for me)...so will have to leave reading these articles until a later date....just had time to skim through some of these articles...
Some articles just appear to be on different blogs, and give no real evidence of specific cases where counter-evolutionary articles were refused publication, rather it was just some posters opinion...however there was one article which discussed this, saying that the counter-evolutionary articles were not published, because there were no scientific evidence presented with the article...it intimated that where as the evolutionists were required to provide scientific evidence of everything they said, the counter-evolutionists did not feel it was required of them to produce the same amt of scientific evidence...which does seem as an appropriate reason for not publishing a particular counter-evolutionary article...
Scientific evidence does seem to be the basis for deciding which articles to print...
I am sure, tho, as I research these articles, I will find other differing opinions...but its not opinions that I am after, I would like to see the evidence...
Your opinions are that the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions than the ones your and those in your "ping list/group" (i.e., FR evolutionarians) hold, are NOT CREDIBLE.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1525629/posts?page=252#252
I'm asking you to defend the statement that there are HUNDREDS of links to various dissenting opinions and studies that do not rely on either creationism or other forms of pseudoscience.
You have consistently refused to provide any evidence whatsoever to support this assertion.
Make snarky remarks all you like, my friend. Won't change the fact that you have been revealed.
For at least the third time, I am unwilling to waste my time posting to this thread any of the articles/scientists names I've seen, on FR or on the web, which were kept from being published in science journals because their conclusions/ideas/agenda dissented from the agenda held by a journal's editors/board members.
That you call them wild accusations is of no concern to me whatsoever, as you and others like you on this thread have made wilder ones against me, which is obvious to anyone of sound mind perusing this thread.
Almost all of you have revealed the truth of my words, as well, as to the obnoxious, rude, and abusive behavior found on these threads and why I stay away from them, with the exception of this particular thread, to which I was asked to post.
Out of 400 + posts, almost all comments directed to me, or about me from you and those like you, are the direct result of my stating that I did not want to offer a specific opinion and because of obnoxious posters prevalent on these threads.
Hello.
Nice to know somebody still wants to fight.
After TWO DAYS.
Best to just walk away dude.
Very familiar with trolls.
Like the one who decided to keep fighting for two days despite repeatedly being told "I don't want to fight", and who when repeatedly shown his own contradictory statements told me "Last warning, don't post to me again!"
Already done. Thanks!
Welcome.
See you in humor threads where we can relax.
Laters, have fun, FReegards.
yes, like that one, especially.
This isn't a humor thread? Dang. Could have fooled me.........
uh oh....now you've done it. : )
ping
You beat me to the ping
Thank you! Now I can see what all the excitement was about that I missed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.