Your opinions are that the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions than the ones your and those in your "ping list/group" (i.e., FR evolutionarians) hold, are NOT CREDIBLE.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1525629/posts?page=252#252
I'm asking you to defend the statement that there are HUNDREDS of links to various dissenting opinions and studies that do not rely on either creationism or other forms of pseudoscience.
You have consistently refused to provide any evidence whatsoever to support this assertion.
Make snarky remarks all you like, my friend. Won't change the fact that you have been revealed.
For at least the third time, I am unwilling to waste my time posting to this thread any of the articles/scientists names I've seen, on FR or on the web, which were kept from being published in science journals because their conclusions/ideas/agenda dissented from the agenda held by a journal's editors/board members.
That you call them wild accusations is of no concern to me whatsoever, as you and others like you on this thread have made wilder ones against me, which is obvious to anyone of sound mind perusing this thread.
Almost all of you have revealed the truth of my words, as well, as to the obnoxious, rude, and abusive behavior found on these threads and why I stay away from them, with the exception of this particular thread, to which I was asked to post.
Out of 400 + posts, almost all comments directed to me, or about me from you and those like you, are the direct result of my stating that I did not want to offer a specific opinion and because of obnoxious posters prevalent on these threads.