Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC

Deseret News ^ | Thursday, November 10, 2005 | Elaine Jarvik

[Cindy]

and now, back to reality...

ON THE NET...

http://www.truthusa.com/911news.html
http://www.truthusa.com/911news2.html
http://www.truthusa.com/911.html

[andyk]

Well, I didn't see it before, and I can't help it if someone posted it before without using the actual title.

[FreedomPoster]

< *DING!*>< *DING!*>< *DING!*>

We have a winner!

And of course, the answer is, "He wouldn't."

[andyk]

No problem, I was a little defensive :)

[softwarecreator]

Exactly.  Enough is enough already.  Every six months we get this crap, "new" election fraud BS, abu grahib and yet another investigation into the mistakes made on 9-11.  Same old, same old.  Sickening.

[DoughtyOne]

I would like to ask you what the answer is for those brought down Pan Am flight 93? Isn't it interesting that the Moslems on that plane brought it down, and nobody can't find some bogus story to explain that away? Failing that, how can anyone plausibly deny a moslem component to the WTC attacks?

IDs were provided. We know who they were. We know what their plans were. We know what training they received. We know what training they didn't receive.

[ModelBreaker]

The prof has a political agenda. "Muslims are not responsible." But if that were true, then how did Atta et al know just when to fly the planes into the WTC as a diversion. If it was a controlled demolition with 'diversions', the folks doing the diversions were in on it. So now the bozos will need a conspiracy between W and Mohammed Atta or, alternatively, Israel and Mohammed Atta as a necessary precondition of their cases.

Also, what about the pentagon and flight 93?

If there were pre-planted explosives, they were planted by TROP.

[Delta 21]

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Dont post crap just to post it then say you have to leave and not discus it.

Why did you post this crap?

Do you believe it?

Do you not believe it?

Reach down grab your pair and take a stand! That or get the hell out of here.

[andyk]

Mr. Atta, Is that you?

Dirka, dirka, dirka.

[andyk]

This was just posted by a troll in another thread.

Thanks. Somebody here posted a link to that thread. I couldn't have found it because the troll didn't use the article's title.

[Rebelbase]

A guy with a 1999 FR account posted this same article and was just zotted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1520868/posts

Bizarro world.

[andyk]

same troll same subject new post

IBTZ

Welcome to the FR.

[andyk]

Awesome link, thanks!

[andyk]

I sure hope they were PRE-planted because if they had been POST-planted...

Heh, this guy is a physics prof!!

[Kirkwood]

DUUUHHHH

[Dashing Dasher]

[andyk]

Yet another good reason to eliminate tenure.

Not that we needed another reason, but this guy is certainly the poster child for tenure elimination.

[Cindy]

Well thanks Andy for sharing this.

If you like talking about conspiracy theories like this, you can go here and read this ongoing discussion:

http://www.islamicawakening.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=105&sid=e0fc02412889ff98c69b039e17ebcb34

"IA Forums Index Main Topics Jihad and Struggle September 11th - Separating the Truth from the Lies"

Now that url above is the first page.

Here's the current page of this conspiracy discussion here:

http://www.islamicawakening.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=105&postdays=0&postorder=asc&&start=240&sid=e0fc02412889ff98c69b039e17ebcb34

It's interesting that this conspiracy is being discussed in the "jihad and struggle" forum:

http://www.islamicawakening.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=12&sid=df297bea93b0147e3d59fe73470452a4

Well, this is pretty typical and scientific.

Happy reading andyk.

[irishjuggler]

"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," Jones writes.

What a freakin' idiot. Even in the highly unlikely event that there were pre-planted explosives, how does that absolve "Muslims"? How does he make that leap? Is he suggesting that the very same morning that Muslim terrorists flew planes into the towers, Eskimos just happened to set off pre-planted explosives in the very same place.

I must say that I'm not impressed with BYU's faculty hiring practices.

[Cindy]

ping