Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia

West Point offered Waudby the same exceptions and held him to the same standards as every other football player. every other football player was able to meet the standard Waudby failed to meet. the standard did not change for him, Waudby knew he would have to complete the run in a specified time, and have to cut weight, he knew this for the four years he was at the academy. this is a matter of Waudby failing to meet a known standard and paying the known consequences. the academy is not holding only Waudby accountable for his tuition bill, were i to be separated for failing the APFT i would be held financially accountable as well. any cadet, regardless of what sport he/she does or does not play may be held liable for their education costs if they are separated. had the academy changed the deal on Waudby i don't think he should be held liable, however he accepted the weight exception knowing his liabilities, so if he failed to meet the conditions of the agreement, he should be held liable, just like any other agreement or contract people enter into.


32 posted on 11/11/2005 2:32:16 PM PST by almostdone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: almostdone
Actually, it says in the article that the conditions were changed for Waudby.

His lawyer, who is familiar with West Point and MIL Law confirmed what is stated in the article in a radio interview today.

Can you post a link or reference to your assertions?
33 posted on 11/11/2005 3:02:53 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson