Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sionnsar
such as the absence of the present tense

Wouldn't that make it difficult to understand things like now, and today?

3,363 posted on 11/10/2005 1:33:57 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3354 | View Replies ]


To: fanfan; sionnsar
sionnsar: such as the absence of the present tense

fanfan: Wouldn't that make it difficult to understand things like now, and today?

It's certainly lost on liberals - they use events of long ago to use as a stick to beat today!!

3,373 posted on 11/10/2005 1:40:16 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3363 | View Replies ]

To: fanfan
>such as the absence of the present tense
Wouldn't that make it difficult to understand things like now, and today?

Surprisingly, no. (They even have two 'now's: a-nis which is "now" and an-drasd which is "immediately right now".)

Instead of "I do..." or "I am doing...", they say "I am at (the) doing..."

I've always wondered, because "at" ("aig") is usually shortened to "a'" (Tha mi a'deanamh...), if this isn't the origin of the English form "I'm a'fishing," lit. "I am at fishing."

3,389 posted on 11/10/2005 2:03:09 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || (To Libs:) You are failing to celebrate MY diversity! || Iran Azad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson