Yes, but here's an interesting story for you . . .
About 20 years ago there was a guy in New York who won what was the largest Pick 6 jackpot in the state's history (something like $25 million). One week later, the winning prize for the same Pick 6 was only about $10,000. Actually it was somewhere in the $1 million range, but the winning numbers was a series like 5-10-15-20-25-30, and there were so many people with that combination that they each ended up with about $10,000.
Whis is one reason why I don't understand people who insist on flocking to buy lottery tickets when the jackpot reaches $100 million. What, $5 million isn't enough to get you off your @ss to buy a lottery ticket -- especially when you consider that your odds of sharing a prize are higher for a larger jackpot?
After taxes, the take home pay is something like $100-some million. Even if you won the minimum, it's not even enough to pay off the bill for a new car.
What I read about this lottery is that there are 140,000,000 combinations. I wonder if one had the money and the time to do it, why not buy all 140 mill combos to win $340 mill? One could have the money to do it but I doubt if it's physically possible to buy that many in the time period given.