Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gobucks

That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the objections to Miers.

The fact that she is WHOLLY UNQUALIFIED, knows NOTHING about Constitutional Law, has ZERO track record to know her true "judicial philosophy" (assuming she even has one, and isn't the political opportunist that she appears to be) and is a CRONY of W has much, MUCH more to do with the opposition.


16 posted on 10/15/2005 9:46:35 AM PDT by jstolzen (All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jstolzen

"That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the objections to Miers. "

Funny, you couldn't, or wouldn't, answer the question. Noted.


17 posted on 10/15/2005 10:06:38 AM PDT by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jstolzen

If we must have an unqualified crony for SCOTUS I would prefer the chief legal council at Halliburton. Cheney probably "knows his heart" and a nomination like that would have the benefit of making the left go insane. That at least would be fun to watch.


23 posted on 10/15/2005 10:39:46 AM PDT by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson