I say yes. What say you?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: nunya bidness
2 posted on
10/11/2005 10:25:43 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: Jim Robinson
Would you consider making this a forum wide poll?
To: Howlin; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; redrock; AuntB
To: nunya bidness
Yes, I do believe so.
After that, I want abortion/infanticide/fetus killing/whatever you want to call it, forbidden by way of amending the United States Constitution.
Who can say with any honesty that Washington, Madison, or Jefferson would not find this practice so hideous and evil that banning it would require not a second thought?
5 posted on
10/11/2005 10:28:59 PM PDT by
jla
(I support Aunt Harriet Miers)
To: nunya bidness
Past time, even though I live in a state that will keep it.
6 posted on
10/11/2005 10:29:47 PM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over principle.)
To: nunya bidness
7 posted on
10/11/2005 10:29:55 PM PDT by
Spiff
(Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
To: holdonnow; Freedom Rocks...; Tony Snow; Sean Hannity
To: nunya bidness
Nope. Unless we abolish large chunks of welfare legislation at the same time, it would become a prescription for bankruptcy, worse than Social Security. Although the same logic will operate at the state, instead of the federal level, so the change might be only nominal [in which case nothing much changes, and bankruptcy threat does not apply].
9 posted on
10/11/2005 10:31:31 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: nunya bidness
Yes. Let it go back to the states, and let serious reforms commence!!! There are times (few and far between IMO) that this might be necessary (ectopic pgs, etc) but not just for any old 'aw, pregnancy will make me fat!' and 'I'm just not ready for motherhood' crap reasons. Let's get some serious
accountability going here!!!
10 posted on
10/11/2005 10:32:08 PM PDT by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
To: AnnaZ; Mercuria; incindiary
To: nunya bidness
To: nunya bidness
14 posted on
10/11/2005 10:44:53 PM PDT by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: nunya bidness
To: nunya bidness
18 posted on
10/11/2005 10:54:43 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: nunya bidness
Yes.
19 posted on
10/11/2005 10:55:41 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: nunya bidness
20 posted on
10/11/2005 10:57:19 PM PDT by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: nunya bidness; Howlin; onyx; bd476
If males would be MEN and protect and provide for the young they procreate, instead of using and abandoning women (women gotta raise the bar, too!), abortion wouldn't be an issue. But yes, Roe was fraudulently foisted on the public and should be repealed. Ms. Covey agrees.
-- a chivalrous, old-fashioned MAN.
21 posted on
10/11/2005 11:05:47 PM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: nunya bidness
22 posted on
10/11/2005 11:10:55 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Bush's judicial philosophy - Aliens' rights > your rights)
To: nunya bidness
No, we shouldn't change the abortion laws yet. I think we should wait for more government suppression of religion and personal freedoms, more terrorism, more wars, more natural disasters, more divorces, more pornography and more crime and drug problems . Then if there's anything left of America we can debate changing the abortion laws.
"Apart from me you can do nothing" (John 15:5)
23 posted on
10/11/2005 11:26:33 PM PDT by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" -Pope Urban II, 1097AD)
To: nunya bidness
The underlying "Right to Privacy" is made up law and should be overturned.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson