Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
"Linux" is not difficult. In fact, I can make the case that it is easier to use than Windows

Not true.  The "tree view" portion that works like "Windows Explorer" is much more difficult to navigate, you can't just click on most "exe" files and have them start right up (most require command line activation) and installing 3rd party software can lead to ulcers.

My wife and kids (all MS users) pretty much refuse to use my Linux PC because they find it too daunting, yet they picked up Windows right away.

Having said that, I find Linux to be a pretty good operating system and it's "bundled" software is much more plentiful than Windows.  There are the above mentioned problems but only the "dependency" issue is totally frustrating.

Linux is close, but not quite there yet.  The future for this OS is limitless.

12 posted on 10/11/2005 3:06:08 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: softwarecreator
Linux is close, but not quite there yet. The future for this OS is limitless.

Not quite ready for prime time, I agree. But I'm not sure how much of a problem dependencies are anymore. New apps can be downloaded and installed with SUSE and it takes care of all dependency issues automatically.

But. Not all distributions are user-friendly in this way, from what I understand, and SUSE certainly has its disadvantages, like all OSs.
14 posted on 10/11/2005 3:53:24 PM PDT by clyde asbury (Can't you see it's just a silly ruse? They are lying and I am lying, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: softwarecreator
you can't just click on most "exe" files and have them start right up (most require command line activation) and installing 3rd party software can lead to ulcers.

That is why I insist on installing software via RPM's. Everything usually goes where it's supposed to go. No command line BS. RPMFind[dot]net usually has what I'm looking for, packaged for my distro and platform.

17 posted on 10/11/2005 4:29:42 PM PDT by EricT.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: softwarecreator
The future for this OS is limitless fragmentation.

There's at least 300 versions already, and no they're not all compatible, not even close.

19 posted on 10/11/2005 4:45:53 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: softwarecreator
My wife and kids (all MS users) pretty much refuse to use my Linux PC because they find it too daunting, yet they picked up Windows right away.

I believe it. However, I was defining "easy" as "easy to use" not "easy to learn."

BTW--my family is the oppostite. They like linux as well or better than windows. The only introduction I gave them was to assign them a username and password. I didn't perform any training at all, and they have no problems with it.

34 posted on 10/12/2005 6:29:30 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: softwarecreator
...you can't just click on most "exe" files and have them start right up (most require command line activation)...

Huh? I single click executable files all the time to start them up.

and installing 3rd party software can lead to ulcers.

Learn to use the tools. :) yum and apt work wonders for dependencies. I don't know of anyone (new users included) who have had to deal with dependencies for quite a while.

36 posted on 10/12/2005 6:33:03 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson