Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Allen H; Cedric

So, let's see...because Bush, the Nixon Republican, couldn't count on the liberal wing of the senate to go to battle with him on say, a Luttig, JRB, Edith Clement or Michael McConnell, jurists the Christian right hoped for, he had to settle for an unknown who is known for her Christianity and now, it is the secularists that are opposing her nomination that was made to make the Christian conservatives happy who aren't happy with her choice afterall? Yeah, you two guys got it all figured out.


80 posted on 10/08/2005 11:06:22 AM PDT by Nephi (The Bush Legacy: Known conservatives are ineligible for the Supreme Court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Nephi

Yep.


86 posted on 10/08/2005 11:08:54 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Nephi

What you said is not only innacurate and jumbled, it also pre-supposes that you actually know something to indicate she's not what EVERYONE WHO KNOWS HER says she is, which you don't. So you're trying to disassemble our points when you don't even have any fact based points of your own. How does that work for you?


147 posted on 10/08/2005 11:47:27 AM PDT by Allen H (An informed person, is a conservative person. Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson