[Raycpa]

the biggest negative in this choice is that it was not an energizing choice,

I believe that if she is in fact an Evangelistic Christian, this will show clearly enough that she will be attacked. This will provide plenty of energy to many on the right and we will be surprised that many on this side object because of her faith.

[Betaille]

"I believe that if she is in fact an Evangelistic Christian, this will show clearly enough that she will be attacked. This will provide plenty of energy to many on the right and we will be surprised that many on this side object because of her faith."

You are just doing the opposite. You are supporting her with nothing other than her faith. By the way, anybody who thinks that "she's an evangelical" is sufficient reasoning to support her nomination should then reconcile the fact that she never got married or had children.

[BigSkyFreeper]

I believe that if she is in fact an Evangelistic Christian, this will show clearly enough that she will be attacked.

I've been thinking about that angle ever since Rush mentioned this on his show today. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the Democrats will attack her on just the Evangelical Christian credentials alone.

I sense faux praise from the Democrats. They've been gearing up for a tooth-and-nail fight over the next selection for about a week or better now.