[Betaille]

"I believe that if she is in fact an Evangelistic Christian, this will show clearly enough that she will be attacked. This will provide plenty of energy to many on the right and we will be surprised that many on this side object because of her faith."

You are just doing the opposite. You are supporting her with nothing other than her faith. By the way, anybody who thinks that "she's an evangelical" is sufficient reasoning to support her nomination should then reconcile the fact that she never got married or had children.

[VRWCTexan]

Ok - I'll bite why pray tell does the fact that she chose to remain "single" and pursue an aggressive legal career make her less of a so called "evangelical Christian"??

Her Dad died when she was a freshman in college and she choose to stay single and continue to support her Mother who is now 93 years old.

Also she started life as a nominal "Catholic" and in 1980 sought out other spiritual meaning that, in turn, led her to the church to which she has been an active member for 25 years.

[Raycpa]

Do you understand the word IF? It is usually included in most dictionaries.

[EllaMinnow]

By the way, anybody who thinks that "she's an evangelical" is sufficient reasoning to support her nomination should then reconcile the fact that she never got married or had children.

Neither did Ann Coulter.

[Raycpa]

is sufficient reasoning to support her nomination should then reconcile the fact that she never got married or had children.

In addition to Jesus many who have followed God laws lived unmarried and without children.

[BigSkyFreeper]

By the way, anybody who thinks that "she's an evangelical" is sufficient reasoning to support her nomination should then reconcile the fact that she never got married or had children.

Gee, I guess that takes Ann Coulter out of the running.