Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WV Mountain Mama

I would argue that clearly stating your principles is not the same as locking one's self into a ruling.


9 posted on 10/03/2005 8:12:59 AM PDT by Maceman (Fake But Accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Maceman

(She)was asked if a potential Supreme Court justice should be asked how he or she would vote in abortion-related cases. She responded "Nominees are clearly prohibited from making such a commitment and presidents are prohibited from asking for it.."

She was commenting on if a candidate should be allowed to be asked on how one would VOTE on an abortion related case. That is not principle, that is voting on a potential case.


16 posted on 10/03/2005 8:20:29 AM PDT by WV Mountain Mama ("Good? Bad? I'm the one with the gun." Ash Williams, "Army of Darkness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson