Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: FormerACLUmember
2 posted on
09/15/2005 3:02:03 PM PDT by
Dog
( We haven't forgotten you Commander Michael Speicher)
To: FormerACLUmember
3 posted on
09/15/2005 3:02:41 PM PDT by
Dog
( We haven't forgotten you Commander Michael Speicher)
To: FormerACLUmember
It was fake, but accurate.
5 posted on
09/15/2005 3:02:50 PM PDT by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: FormerACLUmember
6 posted on
09/15/2005 3:02:57 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Looters: undocumented consumers || Looting: purchases with indefinite deferred payment plans)
To: FormerACLUmember
What exactly is so embarassing about needing to take a leak anyway?
It's not like we all don't do it.
To: FormerACLUmember
bttt for read outside of work. (Don't dare open the link here)
10 posted on
09/15/2005 3:03:57 PM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: FormerACLUmember
"Enhanced" = LiberalSpeak for "completely faked"
Reuters joins Dan Rather, The NY Times, and NBC in the Media Hall of Shame for forging documents.
To: FormerACLUmember
Imagine that!
Well ... a little too late ... it's out there, now, and will not go away.
Congratulations on creating CRAP as an excuse for news.
14 posted on
09/15/2005 3:04:10 PM PDT by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: FormerACLUmember
But not after having their little story make the rounds. Many who believed it, won't see the retraction. Hey, use whatever means to knock Bush down, right?
15 posted on
09/15/2005 3:04:16 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: FormerACLUmember
Too bad, the vacuous liberals will be disappointed. They do after all live for important moments like this.
It makes their own pathetic lives somehow seem palatable.
17 posted on
09/15/2005 3:04:24 PM PDT by
jla
To: FormerACLUmember; Dog
They only acknowledged it because they got caught
28 posted on
09/15/2005 3:07:29 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: FormerACLUmember
29 posted on
09/15/2005 3:07:42 PM PDT by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
To: FormerACLUmember
Maybe it's just me, but liberals have developed a rather unhealthy fascination with Bush.
It's a fetish. It really is.
To: FormerACLUmember
If you go to CU's Best/Worst of DU forum, you'll see that even the DUmmies had figured out that it wasn't real. That's bad.
37 posted on
09/15/2005 3:08:22 PM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(America wants to be free from free from "a coercive requirement to affirm" Michael Newdow.)
To: FormerACLUmember
LAMESTREAM MEDIA...STRIKES (OUT) AGAIN!!
50 posted on
09/15/2005 3:11:06 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: FormerACLUmember
Wait you guys just don't get it.
If Bush ahd come clean from the start and told the press that sometimes he has to go to the pottie than they would not have nned to create this story.
So, it is all Bush's fault.
58 posted on
09/15/2005 3:13:11 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(If you are a John Kerry fan check out my about me page, you'll toss your lunch.)
To: FormerACLUmember
"Once he saw what it said, Hershorn decided the note was interesting and worth publishing. The white parts of the picture were overexposed, so a Reuters processor used Photoshop to burn down the note. This is a standard practice for news photos, Hershorn says, and the picture was not manipulated in any other way."
I am appalled at the media frenzy..They sound like first graders..
62 posted on
09/15/2005 3:14:10 PM PDT by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: FormerACLUmember
Maybe they will come clean on this one too! Naaaah
63 posted on
09/15/2005 3:14:14 PM PDT by
cody32127
(If Democrats are not evil, then evil has no meaning)
To: FormerACLUmember
Of course it's fake. A Regular-Joe like Pres. Bush would have written, "I gotta whiz."
68 posted on
09/15/2005 3:15:47 PM PDT by
hispanarepublicana
(No amnesty needed...My ancestors proudly served. [remodel of an old '70s bumper sticker])
To: FormerACLUmember
I'm wondering if President Bush can sue Reuters for libel??
Shame on them!
70 posted on
09/15/2005 3:16:17 PM PDT by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson