Fixed it.
Posted on 09/15/2005 2:41:57 PM PDT by radar101
EXCERPTS: TATTOOS are not allowed to show
Failure to comply with Image or Grooming Standards may result in discipline up to and including termination.
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
I woke up from my dream...
Thx again!
"Good oysters and shrimp, too!"
So that explains the fish smell!!!
hahaha...you think?
..."Hooters wings are pretty good.
"....
I kinda go for the breast meat, then the thigh meat!
What? She's standing outside protesting something she disagrees with...same as folks like us stand outside abortion clinics and protest that. Sure...her issue isn't as pressing, but it still takes more than just ego to do it.
_______________________________________________________
Sorry but you bought in to the great Dim hypocracy. The women working at Hooters do so of their own free will. It is a CHOICE to work at Hooters. Everyone, the owners of Hoooters, the employees of Hooters and the customers of Hooters are all freely choosing their roles. But this woman wants to tell all these freely choosing individuals that they can't or shouldn't do what all of them voluntarily are doing.
I think we can reasonably infer that the vast majority of childern being aborted would not CHOOSE to die. The right is generally in favor of CHOICE, but we don't buy into the idea that someone should have the choice to delete another. Protesting about abortion is completely different as there is a party with no voice unless others speak for them. Everyone in the Hooter's transaction is free to participate or not.
And the women who go to abortion clinics do so of their own free will. You think we conservatives have no right to protest that, too? According to the law, fetuses have no rights, thus you're arguing that your opinion supersedes law.
C'mon. You levelled the charge of "hypocrisy." Now explain how your position isn't.
You think we conservatives have no right to protest that, too?
__________________________________________________
I said nothing about anyone's right to protest. I said people that protest what people voluntarily do are busybodies, that is Democrats. In general they should butt out.
That has nothing to do with protesting the killing of someone else. One of the fundamental reasons to have a state is to keep the strong from killing the weak. It is not only not being a busy body to protest a state that allows the strong to kill the weak, but a moral action.
Equating a busybody telling people who voluntarily decide to earn a living and buy food at a Hooters they should not do that to killing a person who is not able to talk nor defend themselves is typical Dim hypocracy. You should not all for it.
According to you, protesting such things is a matter of ego, not personal conviction. So which is it? C'mon...you're jumping all over the place. Stick to the point.
Sorry you are not capable of reading what I said. I am not going to bother to repeat myself a third time to someone who either is not able to or does not want to understand and further the discussion.
Fixed it.
LOL!
Well, I doubt it matters if she's 'fixed' or not.
Post #2 on the "Hooters" thead, you go with your bad self. :)
I was laughing too hard!
"No one's putting a gun to your head. Do I, uh, scare you?"
Like clowns do.
I was mis-quoted: I said "I said I wanted to be the meat in a Dagwood Sandwich of Hooter Girls."
I thought tattoos disqualify you? But then yours might not show.
You are up early today!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.