Posted on 09/15/2005 2:26:16 PM PDT by antaresequity
Edited on 09/15/2005 2:35:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
First off the handwriting isn't Bush's...
Look at the first image and compare the 'I'..it appears as if the lower writing is indeed his, but
not the crap about the bathroom break...
Further...when the image is enhanced and sharpened...you can begin to see the blocks of cut and
paste graphics, and their obviosu demarcations...The lower image has been sharpened in fireworks by
three or four degrees...you can see clearly square demarcations around the supposed text..
Oh good. This means that maybe Bush didn't need a bathroom break after all and we can call off the impeachment proceedings.
Ah, no:
They were inundated with irate email telling them what idiots they are (note: I sent one of the emails)...
What can WE learn from this?? Our emails just possibly could start to make a difference??? maybe???
You're wrong.
It's a fake.
See my post above.
I think you may be this year's Buckhead! Great job. You may soon be (semi) famous!.
as in spying on what the President was writing?
Who cares? Ah, you'd be surprised. It all has to do with public perception. I think that deep down inside of us there is a subconscious expectation that "our betters" (parents, teachers, loved ones, ministers, pop stars, policemen, elected officials, etc.) not be like us; not subject to all the frailties of the human flesh, i.e. burbling, scratching, blowing the nose, eating, drinking, getting up and going to the bathroom, etc. etc.
"They" know this. And they know that to show to the public the human side of these men and women is to less --in some degree or other -- the public perception/esteem of these people.
After all, are the surface we all know the POTUS, like your adored 3rd grade teacher, the Queen of England, the minister of your church,and the big-big-big boss at work has to use the bathroom just like we do. But there's still that little kid deep in our subconscious that is startled at this revelation, and develops an ever so slightly jaded eye re: this person.
So, IMHO, that's why this note was published. Another attempt to lessen our (the general public) subconscious image of W. Or, among the more juvenile among us, to subtly reinforce a gleeful perception, i.e. "Hey, get this! Bush as to take a leak! Harrar...harrar..."
Bush virtually NEVER prints. Ever.
so its bogus.
what a joke
You rock.
No, he is right-handed.
I thought so too ;-)
That is her CURSIVE handwriting.
Next?
I've never seen anybody who prints that doesn't match somewhat their script; that does NOT match.
Uh, did you even read the article? It said nothing of the sort.
Oh, please, what nonsense. My printing looks nothing like my cursive. Thank God. My cursive is illegible.
Oh, and if you wish to continue, please offer your credentials as a trained handwriting analyst.
I dub thee "Buckhead, Jr.":)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.