Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The WORST Films of All Time (According To You!)
me | 9-13-05 | Houmatt

Posted on 09/13/2005 11:31:27 AM PDT by Houmatt

Just for fun, what is the WORST film you have EVER seen? And why?

I know a lot of you will be inclined to insert a Michael Moore film, but I am talking about films that are supposed to be fiction.

To begin, here is my personal pick: Ron Howard's The Grinch.

Surely we all remember the classic story from Dr. Seuss. Very simple, all about the spirit of Christmas.

Now, we get to the film. To begin with, the Whos are portrayed as the exact dead opposite of what they are in the story: They are quite materialistic.

Then, there seems to be something happening concurrent to the X-mas celebration. Just what the hell is the "Whobilation?" The audience is never told.

And there's the Grinch. The story says nobody knows why he hates Christmas. So, naturally, he is given a back story that rather implies he should be hating the Whos, or at least certain Whos, but certainly not Christmas. AND he is given a love interest (played by Christine Baranski).

Considering the target audience of the book (and therefore the film), there is some humor and a particular dress worn by the aforementioned Baranski early on (accented by a camera angle) that is just not suitable for that audience. So why have it? Heaven only knows.

Finally, when we get to the stealing part of the story, we see the Grinch predicting some very upset Whos. Now we all know what happens in the original story. But guess what? In this version of the story, the Grinch is proven right. In fact, it takes one of the Whos to talk the others into believing Christmas is more than just toys and trees.

I was shocked when I saw this film upon its release in theaters. Was it true Theodor Geisel's widow actually approved of this? How could she, when it absolutely violated everything her late husband was trying to impart with his beloved masterpiece in children's storytelling?

Whatever the truth was, one thing was certain: This film was an abomination. It was not merely bad; it was offensive. And I have never been so angered by a film like that to this day.

It is worth mentioning, as an aside, the film went on to make $250 million dollars domestic box office, making it perhaps the most profitable Ron Howard directed film to date. However, about three years later, when they decided to repeat or at least further the insult with another Seuss classic, Cat in the Hat, people saw right through it and gave it the b*tch slap it deserved.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: battlefieldearth; shelley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-436 last
To: Fintan

The director also made The Killer Shrews and The Giant Gila Monster. 'Nuff said.


421 posted on 09/14/2005 9:10:03 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Bring back Modernman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
Go look it up on Amazon. There actually two people in the world who think it's worthy of 5 - yes, FIVE! - stars. Amazing. (Personally, I think it's worthy of target practice, but I'm a bear of very little brain so what do I know?) Never saw Defcon 4, but yeah, Leviathan was dreadful.

My worst? MOMENT BY MOMENT. John Travolta. Lily Tomlin. Huge shame spirals for everybody even remotely associated with it. I'm embarrassed that it took me a whole 24 minutes to LEAVE. If it hadn't been the second part of a double feature at the drive-in, I never would have seen it.

422 posted on 09/14/2005 9:42:04 PM PDT by Felicity Fahrquar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
Yeah, it was a Disney film, but they tried to hide it. Here's a quote:

KIDS was to be released by Miramax, which is part of Disney. But Disney boggled at the finished film, so Miramax created Excalibur, to release it, as it were, pseudonymously on its own.

423 posted on 09/14/2005 11:02:08 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: Muzzle_em
It's possible that you found 'Dances with Wolves'... 'entertaining'.

As far as portraying an accurate picture of the American west in the late 1860's... it failed miserably.

424 posted on 09/15/2005 3:08:19 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And now, little man, I give the watch to you.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: somesie
Lost in Translation? Really? I absolutely loved it!

Well, I guess that proves that tastes are different. I found it to be tedious, self-indulgent, and racist/xenophobic (my sister lived in Japan for many years and says that it portrays all the negative stereotypes of Japanese which is what I suspected).

425 posted on 09/15/2005 4:15:05 AM PDT by Shazbot29 (Trolling member of the DU Activist Corps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I have walked out of several Woody Allen movies.


426 posted on 09/15/2005 5:13:11 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I don't doubt that it portrayed the West inaccurately.
Yes, I found it quite entertaining and the cinematography was awesome.


427 posted on 09/15/2005 6:04:58 AM PDT by Muzzle_em (I'm an island awash in a sea of stupidity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
You mean Attack of The The Eye Creatures (Yes, that is how the title appeared onscreen.).

I can't believe someone else remembers that stupid movie! LOL!

428 posted on 09/15/2005 9:35:06 AM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: All
Every sequel to Highlander.
429 posted on 09/15/2005 9:39:41 AM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird
Any particular reason you didn't like it?

Did you bother to read what opened this thread?

430 posted on 09/15/2005 11:17:25 AM PDT by Houmatt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Yeah I read it,I didn't realize it was you that started the thread.
There have been lots of other people responding here. Obviously I rub you the wrong way so I'll leave your thread to you and those you have more patience with. Arguing over movies is a waste of time to me.
431 posted on 09/15/2005 11:27:38 AM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

The worst film I have ever seen, or seen very little of was Out of Africa. What a boring film.


432 posted on 09/15/2005 11:34:05 AM PDT by DaiHuy (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird

I just find it rather bloody stupid you would read what I had to say about that film and then ask me what I did not like about it.


433 posted on 09/15/2005 11:53:13 AM PDT by Houmatt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Felicity Fahrquar

Is that the one where they tried to convince us that Lily Tomlin was into men? LOL


434 posted on 09/15/2005 7:24:10 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Bring back Modernman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

Possibly. I didn't stick around long enough to find out. I harbor deep suspicions about the success of such an effort, though... :)


435 posted on 09/15/2005 8:48:45 PM PDT by Felicity Fahrquar (counting down to becoming an official cranky old broad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: jdm
"Santa Claus Conquers the Martians" is also terrible.

But what about the MST3K version? I loved that...

436 posted on 09/15/2005 8:56:51 PM PDT by Felicity Fahrquar (counting down to becoming an official cranky old broad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-436 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson