Skip to comments.
The Power of Stupidity
Serendipia(?) ^
| June 1996
| Giancarlo Livraghi
Posted on 09/11/2005 11:47:11 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 last
To: King Prout
Are you sure it's that simple?
To: dimquest
Are you sure it's that simple? Aw geez! Just when I thought you two had it worked out! I'd have a cold one if I drank.
Might have one anyway...
142
posted on
09/12/2005 4:47:46 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake; dimquest; King Prout
Sounds like a perfect discussion to have in a pub to get other patrons to buy you drinks and shut you up!
Not stupid at all, eh?
Almost reminiscent of "Who's on First?"
143
posted on
09/12/2005 5:32:15 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I am impervious to insult, being extraordinarily dense, rather like Superman.)
To: NicknamedBob
Sounds like a perfect discussion to have in a pub to get other patrons to buy you drinks and shut you up!
Not stupid at all, eh? Lemme see now, that would be a bandit, er, con man??? Heh, buy me a beer or I'll give you a headache you wouldn't believe!
Almost reminiscent of "Who's on First?"
Uh oh...
FGS
144
posted on
09/12/2005 5:46:06 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake; NicknamedBob
Aw geez! Just when I thought you two had it worked out! How can you 'work it out' with those who don't understand the basic principle behind the:
" Third (and Golden) Law; --- A stupid person is someone who causes damage to another person, or a group of people, without any advantage accruing to himself (or herself) -- or even with some resultant self-damage. "
The basics: -- Do onto others as you would have others do onto you, -- but carry a big stick to beat the stupids.
To: dimquest
Do onto others as you would have others do onto you... Corollary: Do onto others before they do onto you???
146
posted on
09/13/2005 10:24:47 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
Super article. Super post. And, yes, this analysis does apply to the political "leaders" in New Orleans and Louisiana. Click below. (And I didn't write this in response to your post. It just happens that great minds think alike.)
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "Kathleen Blanco: Beyond Gross Public Dumb"
147
posted on
09/20/2005 1:01:23 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(This Freeper was linked for the 2nd time by Rush Limbaugh today (9/13/05). Hoohah!)
To: NicknamedBob
The original Stanley Steamers held early speed records at or near 100 MPH. They were very dangerous in any collision, however. Imagine sitting inside a boiler whose tubes surround you on all sides. Now imagine running into anything solid while surrounded by those tubes.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "Kathleen Blanco: Beyond Gross Public Dumb"
148
posted on
09/20/2005 1:07:19 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(This Freeper was linked for the 2nd time by Rush Limbaugh today (9/13/05). Hoohah!)
To: aworldtrader
No, no, no. You don't plant eggs. You plant chickens. Just be sure to plant them right side up, and not too deep or too close together.
John / Billybob
149
posted on
09/20/2005 1:09:36 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(This Freeper was linked for the 2nd time by Rush Limbaugh today (9/13/05). Hoohah!)
To: Congressman Billybob
"The original Stanley Steamers held early speed records at or near 100 MPH. They were very dangerous in any collision, however...." Much of the negative press about the Stanley Steamers was exactly that, negative press. The Stanley Brothers eschewed advertising, or responding to scurrilous reports, assuming that the truth would win out in the end. The were clever engineers, but they were babes in the woods regarding the world of hucksterism.
Even so, let us grant that an external combustion (steam) engine could be dangerous. Let us also observe that internal combustion engines are wasteful of energy, (that is why they have radiators.)
My point was that now may be the time to revisit these technologies, and try to meld the past, present, and future, along with the competitive external vs internal, gasoline propelled vs electrically propelled, vehicles we all suspect could be built, and may need to be built.
I contend that we could build a safer, more efficient, more convenient vehicle, and save money in its operating costs as well.
Here's a thought experiment for backyard garage mechanics and erstwhile inventors. Modify an engine to run on regular fuel, but with the capability of having tiny amounts of water injected directly into the cylinder after the completion of the combustion process. Then tinker with the engine through a tunable computer, backing off on the amount of fuel consumed, while trying to make up for that loss by adding the expanding steam. If one can keep it just beween the point where it would tend to quench the fire, and the point where heat is being thrown away, it should be a much more efficient engine. I suspect that tuned properly, it could increase efficiency by 25%.
Other aspects of efficiency, such as regenerative braking, could be added separately.
We really need to put our Yankee ingenuity to work, all across the country!
150
posted on
09/20/2005 2:20:13 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I am impervious to insult, being extraordinarily dense, rather like Superman.)
To: ForGod'sSake
To: NicknamedBob
“Had the same problem raising chickens ...”
“You didn’t boil the eggs first, did you? “
This is Art Bell..........somewhere in time.......only you would have come up with a wise-ass statement like this ;-)
152
posted on
10/05/2009 1:21:50 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
"... only you would have come up with a wise-ass statement like this .." In fact, I'm pretty sure that I did.
It was about two or three years ago. Should I try to find it?
I know I can find the poem.
153
posted on
10/05/2009 6:52:13 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(Having the Government care for you, and having it NOT care for you, is just whether you get a bill.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
By the way, I think I found it.
I enjoyed re-reading the thread, thanks for digging it up.
154
posted on
10/05/2009 7:35:39 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(Having the Government care for you, and having it NOT care for you, is just whether you get a bill.)
To: NicknamedBob
155
posted on
10/06/2009 6:44:31 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson