Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: flashbunny
Is it that taking away guns from law abiding citizens who planned ahead and supplied their homes were the ones used in the murders and the super dome?

There taking weapons from everyone. Nobody in NO with their life's on the line gives a shit whether the citizen is or isn't a law abiding. Exactly what is my point? Seize every weapon and sort it out later before some law abiding citizen, who refuses to obey the authorities and leave, finds himself convicted of murder. And by the way, the police seizing these weapons today may have to come back tomorrow to forcefully remove these very same citizens. Nice of you watching on TV to demand these citizens have weapons when the police return so that you sitting out of harms way can feel your guns are safe.

14 posted on 09/09/2005 12:13:16 PM PDT by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: hflynn

"There taking weapons from everyone. Nobody in NO with their life's on the line gives a shit whether the citizen is or isn't a law abiding. Exactly what is my point? Seize every weapon and sort it out later before some law abiding citizen, who refuses to obey the authorities and leave, finds himself convicted of murder. And by the way, the police seizing these weapons today may have to come back tomorrow to forcefully remove these very same citizens. Nice of you watching on TV to demand these citizens have weapons when the police return so that you sitting out of harms way can feel your guns are safe."

I don't know what's worse, your spelling and grammar or your (lack of) respect for individual freedom.

Yes, take away guns from the law abiding, because you're going to be getting all the guns from the criminals.

Guess what: That has never worked. Criminals don't obey laws, and when the cops come for their guns, they won't be anywhere around.

And when the cops leave, the criminals will have their guns and the law abiding citizens will be defenseless.

So, I guess there's three strikes against you: Can't spell, don't give a crap about freedom and rights, and you lack the ability to logically think through a situation.


15 posted on 09/09/2005 12:17:05 PM PDT by flashbunny (Why do I have to defend the free market on a web site called free republic???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: hflynn
There taking weapons from everyone

If you are licensed and law abiding this should not happen. The second amendment is #2 for a reason, it is VERY important to our safety and freedom. If they want to take weapons from the law abiding let them do it when they try to board a plane.

17 posted on 09/09/2005 12:52:51 PM PDT by chapin2500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: hflynn
There taking weapons from everyone. Nobody in NO with their life's on the line gives a shit whether the citizen is or isn't a law abiding. Exactly what is my point? Seize every weapon and sort it out later before some law abiding citizen, who refuses to obey the authorities and leave, finds himself convicted of murder. And by the way, the police seizing these weapons today may have to come back tomorrow to forcefully remove these very same citizens. Nice of you watching on TV to demand these citizens have weapons when the police return so that you sitting out of harms way can feel your guns are safe.

You may want to go back to grammar school and talk to the ACLU.

OTOH, become an NRA member, subscribe to American Rifleman, and talk to some current or retired military folks around here. OTOH, the third option is to ... call Hanoi Jane, John Kerry, and hide under the table. IMOHO.

No criticism intended.

44 posted on 09/09/2005 3:53:10 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson