Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

vanity question - Refineries in the President's energy policy?

Posted on 08/31/2005 1:03:14 PM PDT by golfboy

Sorry if this is the wrong place for this question. There is a lot of commentary now about refinery capacity, or more accurately, the lack thereof.

Does anyone know if additional refineries were part of the President's energy policy bill that was shelved by the Democrats?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: energy; energybill; energypolicy; gas; refineries; refinery

1 posted on 08/31/2005 1:03:18 PM PDT by golfboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golfboy

Yup...He offered incentives and suggested the building of refineries at closing/closed military bases..

Not a bad idea


2 posted on 08/31/2005 1:06:10 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfboy

Wasn't there a thread or something about the President using closed military bases for refineries? Sounds like a smart move - maybe now we can overcome the leftist environmentalist wackjobs and do what's best for the country and her people's well being.


3 posted on 08/31/2005 1:07:11 PM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

I'm afraid it's too late, but it should have been mandated that for national security purposes, that oil companies should have to double their refining capacity.


4 posted on 08/31/2005 1:08:55 PM PDT by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Now we have the impetus with this catastrophe to nullify the moonbats influence and make some wise policy decisions.


5 posted on 08/31/2005 1:09:08 PM PDT by DarthVader (Islam is not something to be understood, it is something that must be utterly destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: golfboy

No more cheap gas ! I guess I wont buy that boat after all.


6 posted on 08/31/2005 1:12:38 PM PDT by Deetes (God Bless the Troops and their Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberateUS

uh, yeah, like they don't want to do that already. Guess what is standing in their way?


7 posted on 08/31/2005 1:13:43 PM PDT by flashbunny (Always remember to bring a towel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: golfboy

Article from CNN on Bush's refinery proposal...

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/27/bush.energy/


8 posted on 08/31/2005 1:19:31 PM PDT by socal_parrot (The coyotes are stalking my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberateUS
I'm afraid it's too late, but it should have been mandated that for national security purposes, that oil companies should have to double their refining capacity.

Too late for New Orleans and the current situation, but it should be pointed out (repeatedly) that we've been trying to construct additional refineries to alleviate this kind of issue, but that the Democrats were holding it up for political purposes.
Payback is a bitch.

9 posted on 08/31/2005 1:20:51 PM PDT by golfboy (character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Excellent, thank you Parrot, that's what I was looking for.


10 posted on 08/31/2005 1:22:42 PM PDT by golfboy (character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: liberateUS

...the the government (our tax dollars) would have to go for that purpose. Not that I agree with your prescription...


11 posted on 08/31/2005 1:25:30 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: golfboy

It takes YEARS to build a refinery. Even without the courts interfering.


12 posted on 08/31/2005 2:22:43 PM PDT by jbstrick (insert clever tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick

You're right, but the President's energy policy has been waiting YEARS for approval. If it had been implimented 4 years ago, we might not be in this position today.


13 posted on 09/02/2005 6:54:53 AM PDT by golfboy (character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson