Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ExDemSince92

I also think RPM gets a bad rap. Well constructed RPM's are an amazingly powerful binary packaging tool..


9 posted on 08/26/2005 8:04:11 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: N3WBI3
I also think RPM gets a bad rap. Well constructed RPM's are an amazingly powerful binary packaging tool..

They're also quite handy for source packaging as well.

In five minutes, you can slap in a diff patch, edit a couple lines of the spec file and have a whole new release.

In no more than 20 minutes, I was able to package gcc2.95, gcc 3.3, gdb 5.3, binutils and prc-tools source trees together in a single RPM. Now....

rpmbuild --rebuild prc-tools-bundle.src.rpm

...gives me an instant set of packages for m68k/ARM PalmOS development that can be built under nearly any distro that supports RPM. Granted, the sucker is enormous.

A Powerful tool, indeed.

12 posted on 08/26/2005 8:59:40 PM PDT by ExDemSince92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson