I have not seen a box that uses elm in quite some time (1995 I think) and any sysdamin who has permissions setup so people can install mplayer needs a big smack in the head with a huge foam LART but still for home users and people that for some reason still use a mail client older than windows95 get your systems patched..
1 posted on
08/26/2005 8:03:58 AM PDT by
N3WBI3
To: N3WBI3; ShadowAce; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Buck W.; clyde asbury; ...

OSS PING
If you are interested in the OSS ping list please mail me
2 posted on
08/26/2005 8:04:33 AM PDT by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: N3WBI3
I have not seen a box that uses elm in quite some time (1995 I think)I was going to say the same thing. Who in the hell uses ELM?
In other news, a new security hole was found in DOS 4.0. with hard disk partitions over 32 MB.
3 posted on
08/26/2005 8:09:53 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: N3WBI3
Yeah, nobody uses it now, but it was widely used for what, almost 15 years, with the sources readily available. So where's the "many eyes/shallow bugs" theory now?
Although it's hardly a serious problem now, this really goes to confirm my suspicion that the security benefits of open-source software are in many cases - not all, but many - largely theoretical. I think the reality is that, in most cases, very few people beyond the actual author bother to read/audit the code for the open-source software they use.
7 posted on
08/26/2005 8:16:58 AM PDT by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
To: N3WBI3
Linux/Unix e-mail flaw leaves system wide open Can't be true, according to the zeolots Linux has no security flaws!
Hahaha ... I'm kidding of course, couldn't resist. =)
Thanks for the alert. Luckily I don't use Linux for my eMail.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson