Posted on 08/13/2005 1:23:48 AM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon
When a Man Dies in a Sex Act with a Horse -- What's a Reporter to Do?
By Lesley Messer
Published: July 18, 2005 10:20 AM ET
NEW YORK How do you report a story about a man who dies while having sex with a horse? With a snigger? Or straight?
Last Friday, the Seattle Times got wind of an Associated Press item about a local man who died after having sex with a horse. "The sheriff's department didn't expect us to report it because it was too gruesome," said Jennifer Sullivan, the Seattle Times staff reporter who would eventually author two stories on the ordeal.
The AP story gave basic facts about the case. It mentioned that the man -- who died of internal bleeding from anal sex with the animal -- died after visiting a farm in nearby Enumclaw that attracted "a significant number of people" looking to engage in bestiality.
Therefore, Sullivan said, "We thought if there was more than one person participating in this, it needed to be reported."
In her first probe, Sullivan wrote that the farm was discussed in Internet chat rooms as a "destination" spot for people looking to have sex with animals. She reported that this prompted an investigation into whether the chickens, goats and sheep on the property had also been victimized.
"We tried to make it as tasteful as possible keeping out the cause of death. As a surprise, I had at least 70 emails from people and the vast majority wanted to know what killed this guy," she said. "So on the second day we had to be more specific."
Although she never reported the man's name, in her second article Sullivan did say that he was 45 years old and added that he died of acute peritonitis due to the perforation of the colon. But because Washington is one of 17 states that does not outlaw bestiality, having sex with a horse is not a crime and his death will not be investigated.
Perhaps the most lurid detail she added, however, was that when they searched the farm, police had found hundreds of hours of videotape showing men having sex with horses. Police are still making sure that sex was not forced on the smaller, weaker animals, thus constituting animal cruelty (which is a crime). Investigators are also checking to see if other crimes like child abuse or rape occurred on the premises.
When asked if the reporting was especially difficult due to the subject matter, Sullivan explained that she's been working on the crime and court beat for the past six years, three of which have been at the Times, and so is rarely shocked by anything anymore. The community of Enumclaw, however, was not braced for this type of scandal.
"People were very, very willing to talk but they almost thought of it as a joke. It was sort of surreal for a lot of people," she said. "I was surprised with how willing the relatives were to talk."
She said that the man's family -- whom she interviewed for the second story -- asked for anonymity, which the newspaper granted. They never suspected that he was involved in bestiality, and were surprised when they learned that he had purchased a thoroughbred stallion earlier in the year, apparently one of a pair he kept at the farm.
Sullivan also spoke with two neighbors -- a husband and wife -- near the farm who had no idea that this kind of activity had been going on. A few days ago, they were shown a tape of men having sex with horses -- one of which belonged to them.
"It was a really rural community," Sullivan explained. "They were pretty devastated."
But so far, despite the subject matter, public response has been positive, she said. She explained that out of the many emails she's received, only one has been negative. Most of them express sympathy to Sullivan for having to write such a horrific story and thank her for leaving out gratuitous aspects, or using phrases like "horsing around."
The two articles also have prompted a local senator to start drawing up a bill that would outlaw bestiality. Sullivan also reported the opinions of a local animal activist who also is calling for reform. Lesley Messer (reporter@editorandpublisher.com) is a reporter for E&P.
"Bestiality has no business in Olympia"
By ROBERT L. JAMIESON Jr. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCE
A Seattle man engaged in sexual congress with a horse that led to the man's death from internal bleeding.
King County sheriff's deputies and Enumclaw police say the farm was a wildly popular spot, flagged on the Internet as a haven for people nationwide who relish intercourse with animals.
Suffice it to say, this story would have been a short-lived blurb of the man-bites-dog variety had it not become an issue of legislative urgency.
When bestiality goes to Olympia, it gets your attention.
State Sen. Pam Roach, whose district is home to the farm, plans to introduce legislation that would make it a class C felony to have sex with an animal. The law would make the crime punishable by a $10,000 fine and five years in prison.
Roach offers the following reason for taking action: "These are sex acts against the innocent that have harmful effects."
Unless the innocent talks like Mr. Ed or Roach is a horse whisperer, how can she know the animal was harmed? Such thinking would make sense if the horse keeled over and croaked while the guy lit up a post-session cigarette and dozed off. That would be animal harm followed by human indifference.
A bigger issue is at work here. Experts on extreme animal love say some taboos on non-procreative sex have diminished or are beginning to over time. Masturbation? Check. Oral sex? Check. Anal sex? Check. Human sex with animals remains a towering taboo, booty and the beast.
But as Princeton University philosopher Peter Singer, the father of the animal rights movement, has put it, "Sex with animals does not always involve cruelty."
Roach's good intentions miss this point. Ingrid Newkirk, the founder and president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, was quoted in a 2001 New York Times article that touched on "innocent" human-animal sex acts: "If a girl gets sexual pleasure from riding a horse, does the horse suffer? If not, who cares? If you French-kiss your dog and he or she thinks it's great, is it wrong?"
"We believe all exploitation and abuse is wrong," Newkirk said at the time, but added, "If it isn't exploitation and abuse, it may not be wrong."
P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson Jr. can be reached at 206-448-8125 or robertjamieson@seattlepi.com.
P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson Jr. can be reached at 206-448-8125 or robertjamieson@seattlepi.com.
P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson Jr. can be reached at 206-448-8125 or robertjamieson@seattlepi.com.
(emphasis added, portions snipped)
(call this asshole and ask him if he wants his kids brought up by the "if it feels good do it mantra")
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/233771_robert23.html
Evening LEL! We so think alike!
Well, let's just say that the local Seattle radio disk jockeys were definitely going for Option Number One.
"Oh!! WILBURRRRR!!!!"
Wonderful.
Wonderful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.