Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" (Ebert 0 Star review ends with peerless dismissal) (Humor)
rogerebert.com ^ | 8/12/05 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 08/12/2005 8:10:01 AM PDT by Borges

"Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" makes a living cleaning fish tanks and occasionally prostituting himself. How much he charges I'm not sure, but the price is worth it if it keeps him off the streets and out of another movie. "Deuce Bigalow" is aggressively bad, as if it wants to cause suffering to the audience. The best thing about it is that it runs for only 75 minutes.

Rob Schneider is back, playing a male prostitute (or, as the movie reminds us dozens of times, a "man whore"). He is not a gay hustler, but specializes in pleasuring women, although the movie's closest thing to a sex scene is when he wears diapers on orders from a giantess. Oh, and he goes to dinner with a woman with a laryngectomy, who sprays wine on him through her neck vent.

The plot: Deuce visits his friend T.J. Hicks (Eddie Griffin) in Amsterdam, where T.J. is a pimp specializing in man-whores. Business is bad, because a serial killer is murdering male prostitutes, and so Deuce acts as a decoy to entrap the killer. In his investigation he encounters a woman with a penis for a nose. You don't want to know what happens when she sneezes.

Does this sound like a movie you want to see? It sounds to me like a movie that Columbia Pictures and the film's producers (Glenn S. Gainor, Jack Giarraputo, Tom McNulty, Nathan Talbert Reimann, Adam Sandler and John Schneider) should be discussing in long, sad conversations with their inner child.

The movie created a spot of controversy last February. According to a story by Larry Carroll of MTV News, Rob Schneider took offense when Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times listed this year's Best Picture Nominees and wrote that they were "ignored, unloved and turned down flat by most of the same studios that ... bankroll hundreds of sequels, including a follow-up to 'Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo,' a film that was sadly overlooked at Oscar time because apparently nobody had the foresight to invent a category for Best Running Penis Joke Delivered by a Third-Rate Comic."

Schneider retaliated by attacking Goldstein in full-page ads in Daily Variety and the Hollywood Reporter. In an open letter to Goldstein, Schneider wrote: "Well, Mr. Goldstein, I decided to do some research to find out what awards you have won. I went online and found that you have won nothing. Absolutely nothing. No journalistic awards of any kind ... Maybe you didn't win a Pulitzer Prize because they haven't invented a category for Best Third-Rate, Unfunny Pompous Reporter Who's Never Been Acknowledged by His Peers."

Reading this, I was about to observe that Schneider can dish it out but he can't take it. Then I found he's not so good at dishing it out, either. I went online and found that Patrick Goldstein has won a National Headliner Award, a Los Angeles Press Club Award, a RockCritics.com award, and the Publicists' Guild award for lifetime achievement.

But Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" while passing on the opportunity to participate in "Million Dollar Baby," "Ray," "The Aviator," "Sideways" and "Finding Neverland." As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: callawaambulance; deucebigalow; ebert; hack; moviecritic; moviereview; personalvendetta; rogerebert; sourgrapes; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2005 8:10:03 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Borges

this movie looks terrible. i will not be wasting my money on it.


2 posted on 08/12/2005 8:14:40 AM PDT by curtisgardner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

"Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks."

LOL! That was good.


3 posted on 08/12/2005 8:14:59 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

The only thing with Rob Schneider in it that I have seen and actually liked was the music video "Billy's Got His Beer Goggles On." Three minutes or so and NO dialog is just about right for him, IMHO.


4 posted on 08/12/2005 8:15:14 AM PDT by RebelBanker (To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Doesn't he have some fashion advice for the Bush daughters he should be giving instead of writing this review?


5 posted on 08/12/2005 8:15:53 AM PDT by Moral Hazard ("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Reminds me of that South Park episode, "Rob Scheider in: Derp-De-Derp-De-Derp."


6 posted on 08/12/2005 8:16:08 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

That left not just a mark, but a permanent indentation.


7 posted on 08/12/2005 8:17:31 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I thought the first one was funny. I'll probably Netflix this one.


8 posted on 08/12/2005 8:17:44 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

If I haven't mentioned it today, Roger Ebert looks like Big Gay Al from South Park.


9 posted on 08/12/2005 8:19:18 AM PDT by sully777 (The Religion Of Peace apparently kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner

Anyone who DOES waste money on a Rob Schneider film needs to have his financial priorities AND his head examined.

Some SNL alumni just shouldn't have movie careers.


10 posted on 08/12/2005 8:19:28 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (William Rivers Pitt: You're so vain, you probably think this protest's about you, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Oh Mr. Ebert, just when I think you're a useless tool, you go and write something like this and totally redeem yourself.

Way to go.


11 posted on 08/12/2005 8:20:23 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

True... but anything Ebert hates is ok with me


12 posted on 08/12/2005 8:20:54 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks.

Yes the movie probably sucks Mr. Ebert but I would like to publicly thank Schneider for visiting the troops in Iraq. How about you Mr. Ebert?
13 posted on 08/12/2005 8:22:20 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Egbert is a liberal d--k. Even if he is right about this movie, he is still a liberal d--k.

I have no use for him.

Pulitzer prize? whats that worth? Anyone who writes the most outrageous liberal garbage wins one. Its the equivalent of a socialist pissing contest.
14 posted on 08/12/2005 8:22:25 AM PDT by myself6 (Nazi = socialist , democrat=socialist , therefore democrat = Nazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Pure comedy. For some reason that I'm still not entirely sure of, I began watching Ebert's Sunday morning movie show. It actually turned out to be pretty good, and I enjoy watching Ebert bash all of the movies that come out. But this article, though, very funny.


15 posted on 08/12/2005 8:23:23 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

Schneider was also in Demoliton Man for about a minute. A pretty good movie with a suprisingly conservative message.


16 posted on 08/12/2005 8:23:56 AM PDT by sharkhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Borges

I'll wait for his partner's Siskel's review!


18 posted on 08/12/2005 8:25:13 AM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myself6

Well when he won it in 1975 he was just writing great film criticism. For those who likes that sort of thing it's useful.


19 posted on 08/12/2005 8:26:34 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks.

I have no particular fondness for Roger Ebert and I usually don't care one whit about what he has to say (*), but that was damn funny.

TS
(*) ... except, of course, for the two rebuttals that I got printed in the Daily News "Counterpunch" column back when they ran it and back when Ebert was in the NY Daily News.

20 posted on 08/12/2005 8:26:53 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (By definition, we cannot have Consensus until you agree with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson