To: freepatriot32
2 posted on
08/08/2005 3:18:49 PM PDT by
MarineBrat
(We are taxed twice as much by our idleness. -- Benjamin Franklin)
To: freepatriot32
Call me crazy but I think that any player punishments should have been carried over to the next year as if the lockout year never occurred. Hardly seems fair that he benefits this way from the lockout and gets to start the season.
In the interest of disclosure: I am an Avalanche fan.
3 posted on
08/08/2005 3:20:28 PM PDT by
Gator101
To: freepatriot32
He should have been barred from being outside a prison. Of course for some reason they seem to like that kind of stuff in hockey. That's a big part of why the NHL has no credibility as a serious sports league.
4 posted on
08/08/2005 3:20:44 PM PDT by
Moral Hazard
("I believe the children are the future" - Whitney Houston; "Fight the future" - X-files)
To: freepatriot32
The fact that they would even consider letting this guy back on the ice is the epitome of reasons why hockey is a declining sport. "Screw sportsmanship, let's have some casualties!" seems to be the attitude.
9 posted on
08/08/2005 4:44:07 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Free Michael Graham!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson