1 posted on
07/20/2005 4:02:51 PM PDT by
minus_273
To: minus_273
Kind of like this post ;)
2 posted on
07/20/2005 4:04:15 PM PDT by
steveo
(Member: Fathers Against Rude Television)
To: minus_273
Of course the MSM thought Lewinsky's thong was pointless. I didn't see it but sounds like a cheap shot at the President since the formal dress code for the Oval Office was reestablished
3 posted on
07/20/2005 4:05:57 PM PDT by
Horatio Gates
(Ye olde roadside donuthouse hooligan)
To: minus_273
They had a story about a new "controversy" involving the White House over some college girls wearing sandals to the White House. Can anybody tell me what friggin' planet I'm on?
Is it.....BIZARRO WORLD!?
4 posted on
07/20/2005 4:06:11 PM PDT by
sirchtruth
(Words Mean Things...)
To: minus_273
Pointless? How about an MSM outlet that realizes the latest scandal is nothing (Rove - Plame), and wants to suggest a light way to exit from the story....especially now that John Roberts has been nominated?
5 posted on
07/20/2005 4:07:18 PM PDT by
TheGeezer
To: minus_273
Well, they have to report on what they can understand.
6 posted on
07/20/2005 4:32:40 PM PDT by
Grut
To: minus_273
I question the timing of that story. It's Bush's fault.
moose cheese stuned beeber Tiajunna shower sister
7 posted on
07/20/2005 4:34:26 PM PDT by
Petronski
(So, ma cherie, you like ze boum boum?)
To: minus_273
I think they were trying to be funny. Making fun of the democrats and their "everything is a controversy, blah, blah, blah . . .".
8 posted on
07/20/2005 4:40:01 PM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: minus_273
Sandals?
Weren't they actually FLIP FLOPS!?!?
10 posted on
07/20/2005 4:53:50 PM PDT by
GLDNGUN
To: minus_273
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson