Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'
arcticbeacon.com ^ | June 12, 2005 | Greg Szymanski

Posted on 07/19/2005 1:48:33 PM PDT by F14 Pilot

Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' Highly recognized former chief economist in Labor Department now doubts official 9/11 story, claiming suspicious facts and evidence cover-up indicate government foul play and possible criminal implications. June 12, 2005 By Greg Szymanski

A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.

Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.

"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds about his comments that first appeared June 9 on the web. "If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.

"More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right."

However, Reynolds said "getting it right in today's security state' remains challenging because he claims explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of 9/11.

From the beginning, the Bush administration claimed that burning jet fuel caused the collapse of the towers. Although many independent investigators have disagreed, they have been hard pressed to disprove the government theory since most of the evidence was removed by FEMA prior to independent investigation.

Critics claim the Bush administration has tried to cover-up the evidence and the recent 9/11 Commission has failed to address the major evidence contradicting the official version of 9/11.

Some facts demonstrating the flaws in the government jet fuel theory include:

-- Photos showing people walking around in the hole in the North Tower where 10,000 gallons of jet fuel supposedly was burning..

--When the South Tower was hit, most of the North Tower's flames had already vanished, burning for only 16 minutes, making it relatively easy to contain and control without a total collapse.

--The fire did not grow over time, probably because it quickly ran out of fuel and was suffocating, indicating without added explosive devices the firs could have been easily controlled.

--FDNY fire fighters still remain under a tight government gag order to not discuss the explosions they heard, felt and saw. FAA personnel are also under a similar 9/11 gag order.

--Even the flawed 9/11 Commission Report acknowledges that "none of the [fire] chiefs present believed that a total collapse of either tower was possible."

-- Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11.

-- The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were relatively small.

-- WTC-7 was unharmed by an airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors of this 47-story steel building yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.

-- WTC-5 and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams.

-- In a PBS documentary, Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, told the fire department commander on 9/11 about WTC-7 that. "may be the smartest thing to do is pull it," slang for demolish it.

-- It's difficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel close to melting.

Despite the numerous holes in the government story, the Bush administration has brushed aside or basically ignored any and all critics. Mainstream experts, speaking for the administration, offer a theory essentially arguing that an airplane impact weakened each structure and an intense fire thermally weakened structural components, causing buckling failures while allowing the upper floors to pancake onto the floors below.

One who supports the official account is Thomas Eager, professor of materials engineering and engineering systems at MIT. He argues that the collapse occurred by the extreme heat from the fires, causing the loss of loading-bearing capacity on the structural frame.

Eagar points out the steel in the towers could have collapsed only if heated to the point where it "lost 80 percent of its strength," or around 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit. Critics claim his theory is flawed since the fires did not appear to be intense and widespread enough to reach such high temperatures.

Other experts supporting the official story claim the impact of the airplanes, not the heat, weakened the entire structural system of the towers, but critics contend the beams on floors 94-98 did not appear severely weakened, much less the entire structural system.

Further complicating the matter, hard evidence to fully substantiate either theory since evidence is lacking due to FEMA's quick removal of the structural steel before it could be analyzed. Even though the criminal code requires that crime scene evidence be kept for forensic analysis, FEMA had it destroyed or shipped overseas before a serious investigation could take place.

And even more doubt is cast over why FEMA acted so swiftly since coincidentally officials had arrived the day before the 9/11 attacks at New York's Pier 29 to conduct a war game exercise, named "Tripod II."

Besides FEMA's quick removal of the debris, authorities considered the steel quite valuable as New York City officials had every debris truck tracked on GPS and even fired one truck driver who took an unauthorized lunch break.

In a detailed analysis just released supporting the controlled demolition theory, Reynolds presents a compelling case.

"First, no steel-framed skyscraper, even engulfed in flames hour after hour, had ever collapsed before. Suddenly, three stunning collapses occur within a few city blocks on the same day, two allegedly hit by aircraft, the third not," said Reynolds. "These extraordinary collapses after short-duration minor fires made it all the more important to preserve the evidence, mostly steel girders, to study what had happened.

"On fire intensity, consider this benchmark: A 1991 FEMA report on Philadelphia's Meridian Plaza fire said that the fire was so energetic that 'beams and girders sagged and twisted, but despite this extraordinary exposure, the columns continued to support their loads without obvious damage.' Such an intense fire with consequent sagging and twisting steel beams bears no resemblance to what we observed at the WTC."

After considering both sides of the 9/11 debate and after thoroughly sifting through all the available material, Reynolds concludes the government story regarding all four plane crashes on 9/11 remains highly suspect.

"In fact, the government has failed to produce significant wreckage from any of the four alleged airliners that fateful day. The familiar photo of the Flight 93 crash site in Pennsylvania shows no fuselage, engine or anything recognizable as a plane, just a smoking hole in the ground," said Reynolds. "Photographers reportedly were not allowed near the hole. Neither the FBI nor the National Transportation Safety Board have investigated or produced any report on the alleged airliner crashes."

For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 911; 911conspiracy; airline; barf; boeing; bullshit; bush; cia; congress; dc; demolition; fbi; hahahaha; innocent; inside; islam; lives; lol; makeyourownstory; morganreynolds; nyc; obl; pentagon; senate; sep11; terrorism; tinfoil; us; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: F14 Pilot

So, all three buildings were completely prewired for a controlled demolition, pre 9-11 (without anybody--tenants, maintenence or security staff--noticing), and the demolition was timed to follow shortly after the jets hit? And the explosives, wires, detonators etcetera were designed to vaporize, leaving no trace whatsoever in the wreckage? Oh yes, that's SO MUCH more plausible than the official version!


41 posted on 07/19/2005 2:00:53 PM PDT by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyShark
I'm covered.


42 posted on 07/19/2005 2:00:58 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (Liberal sensitivities offend me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

"Is this the A&M professor?"

"Emeritus," which probably refers to his senility. He doesn't even live near College Station, and TAMU issued a statement repudiating his statements and distancing him from the university. If I recall correctly, he may live in Arkansas.


43 posted on 07/19/2005 2:01:09 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl

44 posted on 07/19/2005 2:01:33 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

45 posted on 07/19/2005 2:02:01 PM PDT by Anti-MSM (Conservatives wish 9/11 never happened. Liberals pretend it didn't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

"...Ladies and gentlemen...we give you today's Demoncrat Party. A party of kooks, halfwits, morons, philanderers and deviants, not to mention pretty damn entertaining at times...."

You left out, Klan member and at least one murderer.


46 posted on 07/19/2005 2:02:19 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (ISLAM IS A CULT!!!!! IT MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Arctic Beacon, eh? Sounds like someone's been out in the northern lights too long.


47 posted on 07/19/2005 2:02:36 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc

LoL


48 posted on 07/19/2005 2:03:25 PM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

http://www.tamu.edu/00/start/DrGates-statement.html

Statement released re: Reynolds by Dr. Robert M. Gates, President of Texas A&M University:

"The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale.”


49 posted on 07/19/2005 2:04:01 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Ladies and gentlemen...we give you today's Demoncrat Party. A party of kooks, halfwits, morons, philanderers and deviants, not to mention pretty damn entertaining at times...."

And what's REALLY scary is that they attract 48-50% of the voting population. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

50 posted on 07/19/2005 2:04:12 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (Liberal sensitivities offend me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Moleman

How do you explain the people. Are we hiding them somewhere? Ive heard the nonsense about the plane not hitting the Pentagon but this is new to me?


52 posted on 07/19/2005 2:04:59 PM PDT by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
"Photographers reportedly were not allowed near the hole. Neither the FBI nor the National Transportation Safety Board have investigated or produced any report on the alleged airliner crashes."

Alleged airline crashes? I saw the second airliner hit the tower in real time. Is he saying that the MSM let Bush fake the news feeds at all of the networks plus the private cameras so he could go to war? All he's missing are some Rothschilds and some Knights Templar.

53 posted on 07/19/2005 2:05:38 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Bump for later head-shaking.


54 posted on 07/19/2005 2:07:44 PM PDT by Egon (By the way, I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: HungarianGypsy

WRONG!!!!!

Dick Cheney flew those planes personally by remote control. Everyone knows that. We know that because both planes didn't hit at the same time, he could only control one at at time.

Sheesh.


56 posted on 07/19/2005 2:08:21 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: F14 Pilot

Hogwash!


58 posted on 07/19/2005 2:11:48 PM PDT by passionfruit (Using the ethernet to try to catch the etherbunny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry

That's SO unfair. It's as if you guys are suggesting that his credentials as an economist don't qualify him to render an authoritative opinion on structural engineering.


59 posted on 07/19/2005 2:12:37 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Dear Morgan:


60 posted on 07/19/2005 2:12:59 PM PDT by rocksblues (I support the war on terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson