Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coding misstep forces new Firefox release
News.com ^ | 2005-07-18 | Renai LeMay

Posted on 07/18/2005 8:45:23 PM PDT by N3WBI3

The open-source Firefox browser and Thunderbird e-mail client will be updated for the second time in a week because of code changes that have unintentionally stopped some third-party extensions from functioning correctly.

The updates will take Firefox and Thunderbird to version 1.0.6, while the Mozilla Suite will be updated to version 1.7.10, wrote representatives from the Mozilla Foundation on the group's developer news blog. Mozilla oversees the software's development.

It appears security fixes in last week's 1.0.5 update caused the problems.

"There is a very real chance that some of the general security improvements in last week's 1.0.5 update may impact a number of extensions that worked with 1.0.4 and earlier, and we want to identify and address as many of these as possible before we release 1.0.6," the representatives said.

Because of the impending update, the Mozilla Foundation has asked developers to temporarily halt work on localizing the software for non-English language markets, a move that has drawn criticism from some adherents.

"We are getting lots of e-mails from Firefox users in Poland asking us about why isn't Firefox 1.0.5 available in Polish," wrote one developer in the localization newsgroup.

"A few days more, and it's gonna be a big public relations disaster for Firefox outside the U.S.A.," the developer added.

Another developer attacked the foundation in its bug-reporting forum.

"Tens of millions of users are still using 1.0.4 while critical security bugs are already published after en-US (U.S. English) 1.0.5 release," the developer wrote.

Calling for the foundation to release its software in all supported languages simultaneously, the developer said that by delaying the foreign language versions, Mozilla was wasting the work done by developers promoting the foundation's brands in local markets.

Test versions of the updated software are available, and the foundation has asked third-party developers to make sure their extensions work. Fighting phishing on foreign shores The swapping plays on HP gears up for layoffs Amazon faces growing pains Online PIs draw privacy complaints Previous Next

"Extensions that interact with Web content and events may be the most susceptible to these changes," the foundation representatives wrote. "Mail-handling extensions such as (secure e-mail extension) Enigmail for Thunderbird and the Mozilla Suite should also be tested heavily."

A Mozilla Foundation representative was not immediately available to comment on the changes.

Renai LeMay of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: firefox; opensource
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: N. Theknow
Firefox has a problem with Quicktime and Flash.  I know there is a new version of FF which I haven't dowmloaded yet.  Maybe they fixed it in this release.
61 posted on 07/20/2005 11:31:30 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
I only make bets im 99% sure ill win ;) He wont find a post of me saying OSS is bug free, at most hell find one where I say OSS product A has few bugs than Closed Source product B. Did you see his first attempt?

I posted a bur report about ie, and he took that to mean I was saying OSS is perfect..

62 posted on 07/20/2005 2:02:40 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Where is the link to the post and the quote?


63 posted on 07/20/2005 2:03:13 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

I already gave you the link and explained it. Now either honor your bet or continue to obfuscate and act like Clinton and try to redefine the word is.


64 posted on 07/20/2005 4:01:25 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Ill (sic) go away for a week if you say that because you criticized FireFox on this thread you are saying IE is perfect and without bugs.

Ok, if you say all I have to do is say that, then consider it done. "Because I criticized FireFox on this thread; therefore, IE is perfect and without bugs". Now let's see if you'll honor this committment. NOTE: You never once claimed it had to be true or provable that IE is perfect and without bugs. So buh-bye.

65 posted on 07/20/2005 4:05:36 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
What you said is that I implied MS has bug every day (which might be fair enough). WHat you did not come close to showing me was an example of me (or anyone on my ping list) saying OSS was perfect and without bugs)..

When you attempt to change the language of the debate instead of addressing content of it youre acting like a Marxist...

66 posted on 07/20/2005 4:19:31 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Find one post where I said OSS was perfect in any aspect at all and Im gone for two weeks. Ill up it even more Ill put up my OSS ping list, find anything anyone on that list 'my ilk' have seriously said OSS is perfect and there are no bugs or security issues and Ill drop off for a week. But of course you wont, you'll find a slew of people that say its better (and I am one of them) but nothing implying perfection of immunity from bugs.

I'm not one who goes around bookmarking things, just so later (months later) I can say, "X said Y about Z on 7/20/05, and here's the link."

But I, too, have gotten the impression that Open Source advocates (and Mac users) rail against MSFT every time a new bug is discovered, or security hole found. I've read comments like, "That never happens on Linux," or, "I don't even run virus checker on my Mac."

Maybe it's jealousy on my part. But that type of attitude frosts me, so any time I do hear of a security breach in Linux, or a virus for the Mac, I applaud. As for this latest thing about Firefox, it makes me chuckle -- and I use Fire Fox exclusively.

As for Bill Gates bing a left winger... I don't care. MSFT has made me money. I lived in Seattle for awhile, and it was the result of Microsoft being in Redmond that I had a job. So you may find Gates a ridiculous little socialist bug, but in my world view he's created an awful lot of success stories that wouldn't have otherwise been created.
67 posted on 07/20/2005 4:22:49 PM PDT by birbear (Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; ShadowAce; N3WBI3; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Buck W.; ...
Fine I'm gone for a week but in the future keep in mind that when you say "but but open source people say its perfect" that you in fact are the only one that has said their favorite brand is perfect. Ill be pinging you to every MS bug with that quote thanks for the ammo, and Ill see you next week..

NOTE: I'm doing this for the ammo on you, because you still can not link a single quote where I say OSS is perfect and I can link more than a dozen of me praising MS products..

BTW if anyone would mind the OSS ping list for me until next Wednesday I would appreciate it, thanks..

68 posted on 07/20/2005 4:24:04 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: birbear
But I, too, have gotten the impression that Open Source advocates (and Mac users) rail against MSFT every time a new bug is discovered, or security hole found. I've read comments like, "That never happens on Linux," or, "I don't even run virus checker on my Mac."

THANK YOU!!!!  I knew I was not the only one.  This attitude is prevalent amongst a large number of the members of the Linux Brigade.

69 posted on 07/20/2005 5:13:31 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle; Bush2000

Gotta read this post :-)


70 posted on 07/20/2005 6:37:10 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: birbear

Amen! You summed it up perfectly. We know the attitude exists, but they deny it when challenged. Just like the word "Free". Often times they'll claim Linux is free. And they say I don't pay a thing for it. Then when you point out it costs more to maintain linux than it does windows, then they say "I never meant like FREE BEER--I mean like FREE as in FREEDOM". But then they go right back to saying hey I didn't have to pay anything for the 5 copies of Linux.

I guess you get what you pay for. Buyer beware. Anyway, don't look for N3WBI3 to reply he's honoring his post to leave for 1 week. Kudos to him.


71 posted on 07/20/2005 6:41:00 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; N3WBI3
Anyway, don't look for N3WBI3 to reply he's honoring his post to leave for 1 week

Look man, I am on your side on this discussion but you really didn't prove your case.  If prefer MS to Linux and probably will for the forseeable future, although Linux has improved a lot.  You and I both know that people do come across with this attitude of "Linux has no bugs and is 100% perfect and is impossible to have security issues."  Newbie is not one of those types, he readily admits to flaws & points out a few on his own.  I might have missed a post or 2, where did you prove him wrong?

Kudos to him

Yes, he is a very honorable person.  He and I have definitely not seen eye-to-eye on some of these issues but he is always calm, listens to your points and responds intelligently.  We had quite an argument when I first joined FR, but that same day he spent quite a bit of his time to guide me thru a Linux problem I had.  He has done this for me a few other times, even after we have a semi-heated discussion.  I've seen him do it many times to others as well.

I just thought you should know that while you ping people and enjoy your "victory".  Would you have honored your word the way that I know he will?

BTW:  Your screen name is GREAT!!  Wish I had thought it up.

72 posted on 07/20/2005 8:28:41 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Absolutely I'd honor any committment I make. Do you have any reason to even suggest that I wouldn't. I assume all people honor their committments. And if they prove me otherwise, then I never respect them again.

But as I read back through his posts (quick glances)...I concur he definitely isn't the Linux bigot types that I was trying to attract with my sarcasm. But he took the bait.

But my point (which still stands) is that many OSS bigots jump on the anything but M$ bandwagon and bash them whenever a bug is announced. However, whenever OSS has a bug, then it's "Oh but they'll fix it quickly, or at least it not as bad as that one M$ bug".

However, I do find it very humorous that the OSS ping list will be without its owner for a week. I hope some huge OSS news breaks in the next couple of days ;-)


73 posted on 07/20/2005 8:35:23 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I didn't mean to imply that you would not honor your word, I'm sure you would, but trust me SOME people who follow the OSS threads would never admit they were wrong and refuse to pay the price for their wager.

My question still stands though, where did you prove him wrong?

As far as the OSS pings go, don't worry, I'm sure if people see interesting stories they will ping the others, I know I will if I can, but I don't read the Open Source websites too often which is why I rely on NW3B to notify me.

74 posted on 07/20/2005 8:44:11 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

2 places. First, he said if I said IE was perfect he'd leave. That's why he left. I said it (not that I believe it though).

As far as proving him wrong. It goes with the logic of blasting Microsoft for a bug and then touting Open Source. The logical extension of this is that OSS doesn't have bugs. A quick scan of his threads revealed that he posted a Microsoft bug article (and even changed the title to mock Microsoft). And then he praises Open Source. To me that puts him in the same category as those other people that were discussed earlier. You know "Get Linux if you're tired of bugs" crowd.


75 posted on 07/20/2005 8:57:34 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Okay, so he left because you said IE was perfect.  I guess I would not want to be near you either if you made that statement.  =)

To me that puts him in the same category as those other people that were discussed earlier

I would have to disagree with your assessment.   He shouldn't be lumped into that category because he believes that Linux is a far more stable OS than MS, in some ways it is, I just have many issues with Linux's installation and 3rd Party software.  Oh well, if that's what you feel then so be it.  He's gone and that won't change.

Unfortunately, I have to get to sleep ... talk to you at another time ... maybe even at another OSS ping.  =)

76 posted on 07/20/2005 9:09:27 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
NOTE: I'm doing this for the ammo on you, because you still can not link a single quote where I say OSS is perfect and I can link more than a dozen of me praising MS products..

You just don't seem to be able to grasp this concept: When you constantly criticize the quality of IE or Windows -- and then downplay Linux or FireFox or other OSS flaws -- you're essentially making an implicit declaration that OSS offers fundamentally better quality. Which is a sham lie. As I've pointed out countless times to you and others, software defect rates for the overwhelming majority of projects are the same (defect/KLOC) -- regardless of whether the development methodology is open source or closed source. If you doubt this, pick up a software engineering text by Watts Humphrey, Steve McConnell, SEI, and others. I don't think that average OSS guy is foolish enough to believe otherwise; however, I've certainly interacted with a sizable number of OSS zealots (here and elsewhere) who have drunk so much Kool-Aid that they're oblivious to the reality of bugs in their code. I'm not sure that I would put you in that category. You do, at least, acknowledge that OSS tools have some bugs (thanks for posting this article, BTW).
77 posted on 07/21/2005 9:11:46 AM PDT by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

It can also have trouble with PDF pages.


78 posted on 07/21/2005 9:19:25 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
You know "Get Linux if you're tired of bugs" crowd.

The Mac zealots are just as bad, IMO.
79 posted on 07/21/2005 9:31:10 AM PDT by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Sorry to jump in. But, I am also one of the OSS proponents and I'd have to say that its not the flaws that are the main concern between the two, its the solution. Remember the infamous "Ping of Death" attack? Linux was patched within 3 hours, how long did it take for MS to have an update for it? I would actually go so far as to say two releases of FireFox in one week could be a good thing. It shows the speed at which they can resolve a problem.


80 posted on 07/21/2005 10:42:11 PM PDT by xmm0 (This post has been brought to you by the letters "U," "S," and "A" and Amendment number 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson