Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff

She was quite plimp actually, far from being 'starved to death, and much fatter than she was in 1990, when she starved herself to death, literaly.

I don't know what it is with you, spiff, but when your brain is gone, your dead. how can you starve some one who isn't even there to death?

Her body was allowed to die as it should have long ago.
Until you can prove she was alive, concious, aware, you have no case. All the evidence points the other way.

Tell you what. I have to kill a few chickes today, so instead of the usual way, I'll scoop their brains out. If any live, I'll let them go, and starve myself. Hows that? deal?


51 posted on 07/16/2005 3:38:03 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Zachary
She was quite plimp actually, far from being 'starved to death, and much fatter than she was in 1990, when she starved herself to death, literaly.

You obviously don't know what you're talking about. The cause of death was clearly explained in the autopsy report. Also, I didn't know a corpse could gain weight.

Her body was allowed to die as it should have long ago. Until you can prove she was alive, concious, aware, you have no case. All the evidence points the other way.

She was not dying before the judge ordered all nutrition and hydration to be withheld. She only started dying when that was the case. The cause of her death, according to the autopsy, was dehydration/starvation. Who caused that to happen?

One does not need to prove they're alive in order to keep someone from taking action to kill them. If I'm sleeping deeply and you happen to walk into the room, you are not permitted to shoot me.

Tell you what. I have to kill a few chickes today, so instead of the usual way, I'll scoop their brains out. If any live, I'll let them go, and starve myself. Hows that? deal?

Number one, you are one sick individual. This post proves it. Second, you should not be allowed to starve yourself to death. Suicidal acts should be stopped and the person who atlempted them should receive proper mental care as you very well might require.

56 posted on 07/16/2005 3:48:06 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
>> She was quite plimp actually, far from being 'starved to death, and much fatter than she was in 1990, when she starved herself to death, literaly.

She was plump in high school. However, that was EIGHT YEARS before her "collapse" in 1990. By then, she had long since lost her baby fat. She was not a girl any more in 1990. She was married and had a good job -- a slim, attractive young woman.

If you read the Autopsy Report, you'll see that Dr. Thogmartin argued strongly against the notion that Terri suffered from bulimia or any other dietary disorder. Her blood chemistry showed no such thing. Therefore, one must rule out that early and now exploded misconception that she starved herself.

You'll have to develop some other theory why a healthy young woman ended up on the floor at 5:40 in the morning in cardiac arrest.

I have one, if you're interested. It fits the facts very well.

86 posted on 07/16/2005 6:32:16 AM PDT by T'wit (The main difference between Ted Bundy and other bioethicists is, Bundy knew he was doing evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary

wow i hope this nathan guy isn't married. Best check if he has a large insurance policy on his wife. He sure loves this ideal of killing the innocent. I got to admit it does sound like an Nazi to me.


101 posted on 07/16/2005 8:08:34 AM PDT by TrailofTears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson