Gee Doc, what does a suicide bomber look like before he blows him/her self up?
Well, you see, there is this little problem. Our enemies don't cooperate by sticking to the same tactics as we try to counter them, but instead change their tactics as we change ours.
Downright rude of them, if you ask me.
A good idea is to have a Predator Aircraft leading the Helicopter as a "Threat Warning" aid. Threat Warning analysts can tip off the Helicopter of an impending threat. Terrorist cannot hide to well from infrared cameras. The Predators are capable of carrying Hellfires to pick off terrorist before they can fire at friendly forces.
Just an idea
There is a lot going on wrt protecting from IEDs, RPGs and the like.
It is really hard to stop someone that loads up explosives in vehicles like ambulances and targets the response team after a first explosion has happened.
Give our guys some credit.
Guerillas with small arms are notoriously hard to stop.
The "lack of armor" complaint we often hear is a legitimate one on its face, but you have to remember two things: 1) armor isn't 100% effective, and 2) you can't just add armor to any vehicle that isn't designed to carry that kind of enormous weight.
I will answer your question when you tell me why IT people can't stop 100% of hacker and virus attacks.
New systems allowing the protection of our military personnel and vehicles are constantly being developed. Unfortunately, R & D takes some time. It's very easy for you to say "Well, why don't we do this?" It's much more difficult and time-consuming to actually get the job done.
As for the suicide attacks, it's not always easy to guard oneself against an enemy that hides among innocent women and children.
However, considering our fatalities and casualties in the WOT have been much lower than in previous wars, I'd say that we are doing relatively well.
"Any Insights."
Here are two from http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/world/story/60E4F2B3A529215786257031000F31CF?OpenDocument
Lt. Col. Steven Boylan, a top U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, said the insurgency continued to evolve.
"The enemy we are fighting is a learning enemy and reacts to what we do just as we react to what they do if they change tactics," he said. "It is a continuous cycle of action, reaction, counteraction and counter-counteraction."
U.S. Brig. Gen. Donald Alston said there were 15,000 to 20,000 insurgents.
"They've gone to more spectacular systems that can inflict more casualties per attack," said Alston, who added that the shift might be because insurgents can't sustain large ground attacks.
Suicide bombers are the ultimate wild card, this is where we need to learn from the Israelis. They are not 100% successful but they has been effective in reducing the number of attacks.
I'm a veteran, and I agree.
first of all, this really isn't the best place to air this topic...
As for countermeasures, they are working through them. The terrorists in Iraq use anything from remote controlled TOYS to the timers on washers or dryers. You can't jam the latter and the former has many different frequency ranges.
Armor can only protect you so much.
As for RPGs and our Helicopters, well everything the blind squirrel will find a nut. That sucks, but when you shoot 1000 RPGs, eventually you will hit with one of them.
In my year over in Iraq, by my count, there were nearly 300 attacks and nearly 500 rockets/mortars and missles thrown at my base. I had 5 or 6 hit relatively close (within 300 meters) and the closest one hit about 60 feet away from me. it was ALWAYS blind luck by whoever was shooting.
Actually in Iraq, our boys are having success using jamming devices to impeded the usage of IEDs (where some insurgent uses a remote-located cell phone or RC device to detonate an unmanned explosive).
That's why we're seeing so many suicide car bombings lately - a change in tactics resulting from remote-controlled IED failures.
And nothing like the conventional wars fought in our past.
Imagine, if you will, a police station or Army recruiting station on a city street with regular traffic going by. How will you know which one of the passing vehicles might have bombs attached?
There are checkpoints set up around the areas and they do manage to stop some of the creeps. (The media, for some reason, never considers that sort of thing important enough to report.)
When I'm being transported somewhere in an armored convoy on the streets of Baghdad, I always look at all the cars and drivers to see if I can get any hunches about them.
It is extremely difficult. Impossible, really.
All I can tell you is that the level of attacks has decreased over the last several months. The reporting of said attacks seems to have increased.