Replies

"So, using your standard, the dropping of the "Nazi" bomb with regard to the Schiavo case is inappropriate, right?
Or are you going to tell us there have been millions deliberately killed?"

I'm saying that it's an accurate historic reference to note that the same court system which failed Terri also failed 40 million unborn, one of the largest death camp networks on earth, shadowed only by larger abortion clinic networks. It is intertwined. The abortion movement was a giant step toward devaluing human life. How many mothers have killed their babies as a result, for example? And why are mothers who murder their babies given such light sentences today?

Also, the euthanasia movement was given government backing in Nazi Germany, starting off with the weak, the mentally ill, and gradually ascending to unpopular racial groups. [Note that Michael's lawyer made twisted statements about the Holocaust in his depraved book.] The goal of devaluing human life was even found in the Nazis' animal rights movement. Note how the two are intertwined here in the US, today. I agree on one level that cruelty to animals is evil, but it is being used as a tool to devalue compassion toward human beings.

You can call historic references 'cards/bombs/fill-the-blank', in order to 'discredit' its accuracy. But accurate historic reference is the most solid foundation of man-made government you can find. Without accurate historic reference, we would spiral down the leftist whirlpool, repeating ancient mistakes, such as when people sacrificed their first born to the fires of a pagan god, and when Egyptians worshipped dung beetles and mortal men.