Wow--kinda weird to see that even Mike Malloy's Website is questioning ole Scamdy even after having that sweet little interview with him awhile ago! This just keeps growing bigger and bigger!.....except, haven't heard any of it on the MSM yet!
You know, that was actually one of the best debates this side--the side demanding accountability--has had, and should serve as a "guide" for everyone else.
An attorney friend of mine--this is a small place; everybody knows everybody else, and is a friend of everybody else--has been watching this unfold, and he has had a constant complaint about this side, the side demanding accountability.
He says we would make crummy attorneys.
His advice is that we stick with those three questions, keep hammering away at those three questions, and nothing else. The answers to those three questions tells the whole story.
He says that, as laymen, we get too distracted by bells-and-whistles, such as the real or fake checks, receipts, letters, forms, whatnot.....that have absolutely nothing to do with the three questions.
He was surprised that, during that one "show" on the other conservative web-site, that we even paid any attention; whether that "evidence" was real or fake, had nothing to do with answering the three questions. He said we should not have wasted our time reading or responding; that whether real or fake, it was just junk.
The good attorney suggests we carry on as those two did on the Mike Malloy debacle--hammer away at those three questions, asking no new questions, paying no attention to any other "proof" that proves something outside those three questions, and ignoring the illiterate name-calling and cursing.
Those two on the Mike Malloy debacle did just that; they did an excellent job.