Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ART Appreciation/Education "class" #3: van Gogh and Cezanne
6/9/05 | republicanprofessor

Posted on 06/09/2005 3:44:59 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Republicanprofessor

Your definitions and examples are very helful. I wonder whether the critics of the time were complimentary of emerging styles. For example, did they embrace Romanticism or reject it as a perversion of neoclassicism?


41 posted on 06/11/2005 3:30:39 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

I always love pointiallism too. It seemed like Seurat was painting a TV image or a newspaper picture.


42 posted on 06/11/2005 8:32:08 AM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
I wonder whether the critics of the time were complimentary of emerging styles. For example, did they embrace Romanticism or reject it as a perversion of neoclassicism?

A very good question, and I've been thinking about it (especially since Romanticism is not my speciality). I think that often the critics who panned works that later became established have been lost to history (due to their lack of foresight).

However, John Ruskin is a notable critic who was a champion of Turner's work but who did not appreciate Whistler's work. Both artists share (to me) a similar dissolution of form, but Ruskin wrote about Whistler's Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket that Whistler "had thrown a paint pot in the face of the public." Whistler sued for libel and, after a notorious trial (which Whistler relished), Whistler won. But since he only won a farthing (a penny), he was bankrupted by the court costs. However, he did win the right of an artist to paint whatever they want (over half-a-century before Pollock became even more liberal with paint pots!).

Which of these works do you think is more abstract?

Turner Sunset 1840 and Whistler Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket about 1890.

43 posted on 06/11/2005 1:14:20 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Oops. Forgot a paragraph designation in the above post. Turner's Sunset is on the left and Whistler on the right.


44 posted on 06/11/2005 1:15:51 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor
Which of these works do you think is more abstract?.

Good question. I think "Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket about 1890" is more abstract, if only because I had to think a few seconds more to set the basic scene.

45 posted on 06/11/2005 6:24:05 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson