Updated: The company will pack a forthcoming dual-core PowerPC 970 processor into future Mac desktops and even notebooks, analysts predict.
To: Bush2000; antiRepublicrat; Action-America; eno_; Glenn; bentfeather; BigFinn; byset; Bubba; ...
Contrary article claims Apple will go Dual-Core PowerPC from IBM...

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
06/03/2005 8:05:35 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(tagline now open, please ring bell.)
To: Swordmaker
3 posted on
06/03/2005 8:07:22 PM PDT by
montag813
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
06/03/2005 8:09:43 PM PDT by
montag813
To: Swordmaker
5 posted on
06/03/2005 8:11:41 PM PDT by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: Swordmaker
I think apple should look into using that new Cell processor IBM, Toshiba, and Sony are working on. It is the only true multicore processor in procution. It will have something on the scale of ten cores in each chip. Compare that to AMD and Intel's rinky dink dual core phlim phlam. I say phlim phlam because the Intel Chip isn't really a dual core, but two dies on one chip. I see true dual core similar to AMD's chip. Both cores run off the same bus, unlike Intels, and the Chips can use shared onboard cache. this reduces task intervals and drastically speeds up processing. Intel's is more like Hyperthreading to the next level.
10 posted on
06/03/2005 8:45:09 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: Swordmaker
Here's the limit of my interest in faster chips (click the logo):

(what's the proportion of people who want faster chips and people who need faster chips?)
14 posted on
06/04/2005 10:39:40 AM PDT by
solitas
(So what if I support a platform that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.3.7)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson