Posted on 05/25/2005 4:51:39 PM PDT by Panerai
Preach it brother.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
I had lots of fun integrating my mother-in-law's pc into our airport network.
First, I couldn't get the wireless access point to actually use the network it was detecting. Then when I did get it to work it was slooooo as smoke off %##%$%. Never could figure out what was bridging the gap; xp or the wap software. Using both (i think) it got acceptable speed, but then I had to reinitate the connection every time she went on line, and I still not sure how I did it.
Final solution; I bought an express hub and plugged the pc's ethernet cable into it. Configured the whole thing remotely from my mac and it's run like a scalded dog ever since.
And as the games go away so will the fast paced 3d card market subside and the ever increasing need for faster PC processors become less important. The whole personal computer market will slow down as the smaller game console market gets bigger and the hardware differences between linux, MS Windows, and macOS will seem less important.
People who still build their computer tweaking it for speed will soon be as scarce as those who were still building their own radios from kits in the 60s and 70s.
Appletalk was aweful but thats gone now, osx is as network and user friendly (if not more) than windows. I use both quite a bit...
I hear you, I avoide windows because of all the money bill gives planned parenthood, and the UN 'population control' effort..
Winn sounds incompetent. Based on what I've read by him, I wouldn't give him a second interview for any technology position.
But I've never blamed that on Apple; I believe it's Microsoft's fault. Apple OSs are rooted in one of the ultimate networking systems: Unix. There's only two reasons why Apples can't be easily popped into a MS Domain: either MS is not sharing enough info with Apple about the structure of the MS protocols, or they are intentionally screwing up the protocols enough to mess with the Apples.
For instance, I've always wondered why the X400 protocol didn't come standard with the first versions of Entourage: I mean, come on - Entourage "is" Outlook for a Apple and Outlook is optimized to X400 to Exchange - so why didn't MS design Entourage to behave like Outlook from the start? They had to know it was going to be deployed in Exchange domains.
I'm not a conspiraziod so I don't believe there's a concerted effort at MS to sabotage Apples but I can envision one or two programmers at MS being petty enough to throw a cog in the networking code.
In any event, I've found it bizarre how difficult it is to get Apples - which tend to be well designed - to work well in enterprise PC networks that have been equally well engineered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.