Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2005 12:25:45 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: B4Ranch

Yes.


2 posted on 05/10/2005 12:27:20 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
May I suggest that we all write a very short letter to our officials, local, state and federal.

NO! :-)

3 posted on 05/10/2005 12:27:45 PM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch

"NO" vanities posted under "News/Activism"


4 posted on 05/10/2005 12:27:50 PM PDT by colorcountry (To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable. ....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch

maybe


5 posted on 05/10/2005 12:27:51 PM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch

YES!


6 posted on 05/10/2005 12:28:08 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (AN ACTIVIST JUDICIARY IS A CULT!!!!! IT MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
I like the extra bolding you've used. It gives the word a much more emphatic tone. ;)
7 posted on 05/10/2005 12:28:12 PM PDT by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
YES!

8 posted on 05/10/2005 12:28:54 PM PDT by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90 T6 AWD....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch

The following two points:

* "NO!" to open borders and illegal aliens in America.

and

* "NO!" to tax increases.

Are mutually contradictory.

You're going to need to hire a lot more federal employees to do the former. They have to be paid.


9 posted on 05/10/2005 12:30:37 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
MAYBE
10 posted on 05/10/2005 12:31:17 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch; martin_fierro; Constitution Day

Inquiring minds want to NO.


12 posted on 05/10/2005 12:31:30 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Some days it doesn't pay to chew through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
Damn Skippy !

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
VADER 2008

Based on the evidence provided by the films, we can extrapolate the benefits of a Vader Presidency:

Total Commitment in the War on Terror - we can presume from the destruction of Alderaan, and the elimination of the Rebel base on Hoth, that Lord Vader would take an aggressive approach to terrorists. Terrorist bases would be totally destroyed, and the military might get to use those really cool Imperial walkers in the process. Captured terrorists could expect to have their veins shot up with truth serum by sinister looking droids. And no matter where Osama was hiding, Lord Vader could use the power of the Force to strangle him to death.

Smaller Government - at the beginning of Episode IV, we are informed that the Emperor has taken the bold step of eliminating the Senate, and thus a layer of expensive bureaucrats. Some people would pay real money to see the present United States Senate disbanded as blithely. Reduced Taxation - no one in the Galactic Empire is filling out forms for an Interstellar IRS, so far as can be seen. Besides, given Lord Vader's impatience in getting a Death Star built, he'd likely be so irritated by tax officers' incompetence, he'd strangle the lot.

Ethical Use of Biotechnology - biotechnology in a Vader administration would only likely be used to produce clone warriors rather than create replacement body parts: indeed, Lord Vader didn't create a clone of himself so that he could have his body parts replaced, thus indicating a higher level of ethics about cloning than has hitherto been seen from many scientists.

Strong Defence - the clone warriors would solve the problem of military recruitment, and furthermore, "Star Wars" research wouldn't stop until they'd developed a weapon to blow up a planet. As such, it's unlikely Middle Eastern terrorists would be inclined to mess with a President Vader.

It is clear that the benefits of a Vader Presidency outweigh the occasional "hostile takeover". It is also clear that few people in their right mind want to be President, as such, it may be time to draft someone who doesn't exist at all.

15 posted on 05/10/2005 12:33:57 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch

Nyet!


16 posted on 05/10/2005 12:35:56 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell ( Rather drawing $75,000 per speech? Thank God the country isn't powered by bull sh*t!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
Does your idea suck?

I say NO!

19 posted on 05/10/2005 12:38:16 PM PDT by ctlpdad (There can be no triumph without loss, no victory without suffering and no freedom without sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
Obviously some folks have more trouble with the word "No!" than others
20 posted on 05/10/2005 12:38:53 PM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson