Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

So they would rather have a chick flick than a show with mostly male audience.
1 posted on 05/01/2005 9:58:17 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

not necessarily. whatever gets ratings, gets air.


2 posted on 05/01/2005 10:00:07 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

As long as there are Sci Fi fans...there will be a Star Trek...


3 posted on 05/01/2005 10:01:18 AM PDT by Dallas59 (" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JenB; marajade; ValenB4; mikrofon; filbert; bentfeather; Brett66; eccentric; melbell; Tolik; ...

5 posted on 05/01/2005 10:01:59 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I liked it, but could never find it after the first season. With 100 and something channels it's extemely important for television networks to make sure that a show doesn't move out of a time slot. They could get away with this with fewer channels, but now shows just get lost.


6 posted on 05/01/2005 10:02:12 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Yup and Andromeda is in its final season also.

Understand that the NYT is upset because there Utopian future is finished.

Me I would rather have the B% universe with its untidiness or the mirror universe with its nastiness.

The sixties are finally dead.

Kill Ensign Crusher.

8 posted on 05/01/2005 10:03:11 AM PDT by dts32041 (Two words that shouldn't be used in the same sentence Grizzly bear and violate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"As Jolene Blalock, who played the Vulcan officer T'Pol on "Enterprise," explained: "The stories lacked intriguing content. They were boring." A lifelong "Star Trek" fan, Ms. Blalock said she was dismayed by early "Enterprise" scripts that seemed to ignore basic tenets of the franchise's chronology, and that offered revealing costumes instead of character development. "The audience isn't stupid," she said."

______________________________________________________________

My opinion of Ms. Blalock just went up a notch. I always hated that ridiculous outfit too, as well as the mangling of the chronology.


9 posted on 05/01/2005 10:06:09 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

..actually, the last couple weeks of ST:E have been quite entertaining. :/


12 posted on 05/01/2005 10:09:06 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"Star Trek" has earned its death. Let's hope the upcoming "Star Wars" series will not suffer the same PC fate as their sci-fi cousins.


16 posted on 05/01/2005 10:13:11 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The New York Fishwrap continues its tradition of assigning reporters who know nothing about the subject on which they are reporting. Of course, when you are smarter than the *ugh* public, why should that matter, right?

Better discussion here

21 posted on 05/01/2005 10:21:59 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

There's too much good Star Trek already out there to put on a mediocre show and expect people to watch it, let alone several mediocre shows in succession. The two guys in charge are a couple of Hollywood fossils.


25 posted on 05/01/2005 10:26:03 AM PDT by grizzly84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It was too PC for my tastes. All sorts of agenda programming.


26 posted on 05/01/2005 10:29:06 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Enterprise was a lame rip off and everyone knew it..
The "Star Trek" mystique is about going forward not backward in time(as a series)..
There will be another "Star Trek" spin off.. the base concept is just too good..
The Enterprise "prime requisite" just sucked.. thats all..
31 posted on 05/01/2005 10:54:05 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Its dead, Jim.

Someone had to say it.

35 posted on 05/01/2005 11:03:26 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

' "Star Trek: Nemesis" was the series' first bona fide bomb '

My knuckleheaded buddy dragged me to this disaster. Within the first 15 minutes some idiotic android / robot thingsmajig started singing at a wedding. I knew this was going to go dowbhill from there. I had visions of wringing my buddy's neck. Even my buddy started laught at one point and we left half way through. Holy Mackeral, was that a bad movie.


36 posted on 05/01/2005 11:04:48 AM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
After Star Trek -- Next Generation it was all downhill, p.c. butthump. A few goodies emerged, like the shape shifters and Cardasians in Deep Space Nine and the WONDERFUL Borg and company from Voyager but mostly it was boring gender/race crapola, sexy, stupid twitorama and mediocre acting.

Jean Luc and company were the zenith of the series. I put up with THEIR occasion "agenda" and "messages" ONLY because the characters were the best.

And, after all these years I began to see the newer shows repeat the same ole stories from the original Star Trek. The show had lost its ability to come up with the cash to pay for one or two of Hollywood's 10 good writiers.

Enterprise was actually a good idea, going slightly back in time, but they destroyed it with the unbelievably boring trite old cliches with women and gender. It got downright annoying to watch. I know the guys loved the briefer and tighter twit-tit-butt-crotch-clothes with the more and more lurid, weird sex scenarios, but, for me, enormous yawn-o-rama.

The show was three past its prime, waiting to die.

R.I.P., Star Trek.
Thanks for the memories!

37 posted on 05/01/2005 11:05:40 AM PDT by starfish923 (Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I tried to like this show, but I just couldn't get past Scott Bakula. He's good actor, I liked him a lot in Quantum-Leap for which I thought he was perfect. He really made that part his own. But, in STE he just always seemed to be acting.


40 posted on 05/01/2005 11:14:03 AM PDT by vigilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Trek's not dead, as long as I have my tapes of the original series. Guess when Enterprise bites the dust, I'll pop in "Arena" or "The Tholian Web". Now that's entertainment!
45 posted on 05/01/2005 11:25:07 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That's not what they said. They said UPN's primary demographic is female's, that made it difficult to build Enterprise audience because most of the people that were showing their "free" commercials to (commercial time in other UPN shows) were not in the demographic that watches Star Trek, it also meant no spill over from the previous show, and meant Enterprise didn't provide spill over to the next show. Thus why they kept shifting it in the schedule, add that the previous season really wasn't very good and you've got a major flop situation on your hands.

Really they need to shut down Star Trek for 10 or 15 years, let it rest, let the audience re-juvinate, pick up the next direction of scifi and fit Star Trek into that.


46 posted on 05/01/2005 11:26:36 AM PDT by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I thought Star Trek was pretty much over when Next Generation ended.

I don't know how they did it, but the Original Series (Kirk, Spock, McCoy) was somehow imbued with that 'Space Race' optimism and "can-do" attitude. Nothing after that felt as compelling, though the Next Generation came close at times.

I couldn't stand Deep Space 9. I mean, I know what a soap opera is. Puttying up noses and claiming it's in space doesn't make it any different.

The two times I tuned into Voyager and Enterprise told me that the staff wasn't capable of assemblinbg even a bad Doctor Who episode.


49 posted on 05/01/2005 11:29:42 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

B & B killed Star Trek. Enterprise never had a chance sadly. Instead of making more Trek, they decided to write a time cops story about somthing which never ever existed in trek before.

A prequel still could be done right - and it can appeal to new viewers. Whether we are talking about the romulan-human war, or getting back to space exploration (the way roddenberry did it in the orginal star trek or even TNG/DS9).

If you ask me, Trek has been in decline since voyager.. essentially since paramount made it to where you could see it on UPN only. Syndication is what MADE Trek viewable. Stations could plug it in where its audience could find it.

anyways..


51 posted on 05/01/2005 11:35:28 AM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson