To: BerthaDee; governsleastgovernsbest; MeekOneGOP
The headline is misleading. The article simply states that the new Pope is an old guy, and will probably not live long, it does not "call" for his death. Pah. Sensationalism."The good news is that Ratzinger is 78 and should die soon."
Are you illiterate or do you just play one on the internet? The fact that the "blogger" made reference to "good news" makes it clear that the "blogger" is hoping for the Pope's quick death. The thread title is accurate.
To: Lancey Howard
91 posted on
04/19/2005 4:35:43 PM PDT by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Lancey Howard
Are you illiterate or do you just play one on the internet? The fact that the "blogger" made reference to "good news" makes it clear that the "blogger" is hoping for the Pope's quick death. The thread title is accurate. Are you a real sphincter, or . . . oh, never mind, I can tell by your post.
My dear man, the title of the thread makes it seem as though someone is calling for the death of the new Pope. He does no such thing. Do you understand the meaning of the word "call?" Hoping is not a "call" for anything.
By the way, thank you for your service.
93 posted on
04/19/2005 4:50:17 PM PDT by
Finger Monkey
(H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
To: Lancey Howard
The fact that the "blogger" made reference to "good news" makes it clear that the "blogger" is hoping for the Pope's quick death. The thread title is accurate.Maybe it would have been more accurate to say that the post hoped for the early death, not "called" for it.
97 posted on
04/19/2005 5:42:14 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Honestly - would anybody be surprised if it was revealed George Felos is a necrophiliac?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson