To: Jeff Head; k2blader; beezdotcom; pc93; freepertoo; nicmarlo
>>No, actually the burden of proof in any death penalty cases is set at "beyond a reasonable doubt".
I think that was Jim Robinson's point too... and I agree...
"The last I heard, in this country when you are on trial for your life, if there is one doubtful juror, you don't receive a death sentence."
>>pro-INNOCENT life.
dittos, beezdotcom
238 posted on
04/07/2005 3:55:48 AM PDT by
Future Useless Eater
(FreedomLoving_Engineer) (It was wrong to kill her. No other "facts" matter.-JimRobinson)
To: Future Useless Eater; k2blader
Bingo. Terri was innocent and was killed in spite of significant doubt...on the orders of a faithless and adulterous husband and a Judge who was himself conflicted hoplessly (IMHO) with the attorney of the husband and the very hospice that carried out his dreadful and fatal judgement. A horrific travesty and a styain and a blight on this land of the brave and the free.
239 posted on
04/07/2005 4:58:50 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson