Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
There has always been tension between the branches of the American Government, and that is as it should be.

Frankly, I think that the courts ruled correctly under the law, if inhumanely. However they were put into this impossible situation, deliberately.

I think that you will shortly see the Schaivo affair used as ammunition for an attack on the powers of the Judiciary branch.

The Republicans have been spoiling for this fight for two or three years now, and they've used this situation to prepare the battleground for a public fight.

They knew how the courts would rule and they planned for their special laws to be rejected. They will use the Schaivo case to drag the reputation of our judges down to an attackable level.

You will hear more and more about activist judges and why the Republicans need to replace them with conservatives. Clever politics. Too bad they have to involve the death of a citizen.
16 posted on 03/31/2005 7:56:12 AM PST by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lOKKI; churchillbuff

I don't think the reputation of judges needs much more of your conspiracy theory "dragging down" - they've done that just fine by themselves, thank you.

As for Bush's responsibility, it goes way beyond him. The courts have been dictating all domestic policy (and are creeping into international policy) in the US for many a long year now, and the other two branches have let them get away with it, one decision at a time.

I don't think it's too late to fight back, but it's not going to be easy, and we've got to light a fire under our elected reps. That will give them a bit of backbone.


19 posted on 03/31/2005 8:00:44 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: lOKKI
I think that you will shortly see the Schaivo affair used as ammunition for an attack on the powers of the Judiciary branch.""""

To have stopped Judge Greer from usurping Executive-branch power would not have been "an assault on the judcial branch" -- it would have been an assault on an unconstitutional power grab. Since Jeb and the GOP weren't interested in stopping Greer's power grab in order to save Terri's life, I really doubt that we're going to see, in the near or distant future, a genuine effort to rein in unconstitutional arrogance by the courts. There will be the usual rhetorical bones thrown to conservatives, but, as one freeper suggested yesterday, the politicians actually LIKE having courts assume legislative and executive power, because it takes hot potatoes off the politicians' hands. They can say, "It's a court order, i''m not responsible and there's nothing I can do about it."

20 posted on 03/31/2005 8:01:47 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: lOKKI

This case, having destroyed the credibility of the GOP, will make reigning in the judiciary much more difficult, as well as increase the difficulty of banning gay marriage.

That is the result of allowing emotion and thoughtlessness to get the upper hand. The willingness of the GOP to pander to these forces is an unmitigated disaster.


37 posted on 03/31/2005 10:17:11 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson