Wow. Thanks for finally ending the suspense. I've seen several comment in other Schiavo threads, "I wonder what Dat Mon" thinks about all this.
Thanks, for posting that. I have been holding my tongue for ten days, so to speak. LOL. my doctor asked me what I had been doing when I told her my jaw was hurting. I told her I had been grinding my teeth.
You say: And so I ask just what is the 'rule of law' in this particular case of Terry Schiavo...what is the legal precendent to starve a woman to death who has NOT BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME.... there is none. Not in our legal system that I am aware of. So perhaps the 'rule of law' at its most basic level is NOT being followed here.
Why can't Bush have his police arrest all persons interfearing with her parents giving Terri food and water by non-extrordinary means (ice chips) and instruct the AG to present them up for Jury trial on charges of conspirasy to murder in the 1st degree. This would include Sherriffs, local cops, lawyers and judges.
There is no constitutional legisllation demanding starvation by nonextrordinary means.
Awesome and well considered post.
Excellent tinfoil-free post. I agree!!
Excellent point. From the state's POV, as an objective investigater, they should be looking at this as an abusive situation. The state should take custody and presume all principles in the eight year legal battle, judge included, as possible contributors. Everyone seeking access to Terri, once the state stabilized her condition, should be screened and monitored until the state resolves this.