I agree, it's not Jeb's fault. I did just send him an email, stating that the point of law needing to be reviewede is why Terri hasn't been granted a divorce from Michael Schiavo because of adultery. To me, this case boils down to this one miscarriage of justice. My God, if Florida State Law doesn't recognize being "shacked up" with 2 kids by another woman is grounds for divorce, everybody in the state had better flee the hellhole.
reviewede = reviewed
Has it come to this? Is it now the position of the right-to-life movement that divorce ought to be granted automatically under some circumstances, without the spouse even asking for it?
I'm wondering if an annulment from the church would be/would have been a better route to take. Would a court recognize it as a disolution of their marriage?
This case will be studied in law school for years to come to see what went wrong and what was right about it.
"I did just send him an email, stating that the point of law needing to be reviewede is why Terri hasn't been granted a divorce from Michael Schiavo because of adultery..."
Mt assumption would be because she didn't ask or file for it???
It would be a basis for a dissolution of marriage (a Fla. term for what evryone else knows as divorce) if one of the parties to the litigation chooses to assert it a basis for the allegation that the marriage is irretreivably broken. But adultery itself is not a bais for the state to undertake unilateral action to become a party to a divorce that neither party to the marriage has brought. The arguments raised here have become ever increasingly bizarre and outlandish.