Has it come to this? Is it now the position of the right-to-life movement that divorce ought to be granted automatically under some circumstances, without the spouse even asking for it?
If I'm not mistaken, there was a request for divorce filed by the parents. Our hero, that great font of wisdom and knowledge, Judge Greer dismissed it.
I ask you this, is it now the position of the death cult(ure)that a person should be killed by the state without knowing for a fact that there is no hope? Or that this POS called a "husband" might possibly be responsible for her injuries in the first place; and, knowing that he is an adulterer, at the very least, might possibly have an ulterior motive for wanting his actual WIFE's death.
I'll err on the side of life everytime, given these circumstances. To do otherwise is just not right, and I don't care what you, some stupid judge, or anyone else says about it. Justice must be served. If the law conflicts with justice, then the law be damned. History shows lots of laws that were in retrospect, null, because they conflicted with justice.
The evidence is, the man is an adulterer, and thus has given up any right to control his wife's affairs, especially whether she should live or die. Facts are facts, and they're very hard to get away from. This POS MICHAEL SCHIAVO IS AN ADULTERER. There are 2 living, breathing children as proof. Ex-husbands should not have the right of life and death over ex-wives. In the eyes of God (and every State Law I've ever heard of), an adulterer can be considered an ex-spouse. Just because she is unable to file the papers, or some asinine potentate of a judge is too stupid to see it, doesn't make it any less right.