Commander-in-Chief Lieutenant George W. Bush...AWOL ?

26 March 2005 | James F. Rowland

[steampower]

Well, I gladly swallowed the purple pill, but there is this gnawing feeling inside of me that just won't go away.

My hero, the man for whom I've waged many bitter cyber battles, seems to have laid down his arms.

George W(ith the Lion's Heart) Bush, stalwart defender of the rights of the oppressed, World Leader of world leaders, is...

...is where?

Don't tell me he's AWOL.

Not now! It can't be!

The enemies of our liberty are inside our walls, where is our Chief?

We have convened our council, laid out our plans, drafted a declaration of war with the full approval of our Leader, strapped on our swords, put on our helmets, raised up our banners, and, and...

Did someone say, "Hurry up and wait"?

I just don't get it. Of course, I'm only a grunt, but it looks to me like we have everything we need for this battle. We're armed with a law, untested, but good enough for the immediate job. We have a large force, maybe not quite as big as those arrayed against us, but we're more fired up. And we have a Leader who has proven his mettle against all of our enemies thus far.

With Right on our side, we can't lose!

All we need now is our Chief.

I just called his house again, but there's no answer.

Our Field Commanders fired a volley of arrows at the rebels but they caught them and contemptuously threw them away.

The rebels are laughing at our weapons.

Oh boy!

Somebody find the Chief will ya'.

[conservlib]

How is it THAT THE SYSTEMATIC SLAUGHTER OF 2 MILLIONS CHRISTIANS IN SUDAN are not valued as this one woman life? How is it that my recommendation for focusing on bigger issues that affect our nation is antisemitic? You have got mental problem, go seek help.

[RepublicMan4U]

Sorry, but you seem to have missed my sarcasm, which I thought was clear. I completely agree with what you are saying. My point was that Neo-Cons like we have in government right now seem to always try to silence opposition conservative voices by throwing out silly charges like Anti-Semitism. I'm guessing your comment probably didn't go over too well on FR, did it? Please re-read my response and understand that I'm on your side.

[conservlib]

Thank god you were being sarcastic. I have assaulted so many times for thinking America first, or small government, and have been thrown this convenient label of antisemitic if ever attempt to talk about the Middle East. So this time without talking about the Middle East, I got that label, which made me real sad as far the intellectual depth of some on this forum. Thank you for clearing this out.