Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: steampower

Well, you're right. Terri wasn't indicted for anything, so a trial by jury was never called for. Silly post.


4 posted on 03/25/2005 9:39:12 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
The most bizarre aspect of the Schiavo case is the legal precedent that it sets. I look forward to the next time someone files a civil lawsuit and calls for the execution of the defendant as part of the damages against him.
8 posted on 03/25/2005 9:43:52 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

That is the point. In the case I referred to a man was accused of picking flowers and biting a cop. He was entitled to a trial by jury and they acquited him.

Why should matters of an alleged crime, be they ever so insignificant, attain to the level of a jury trial, while a matter of life or death is left in the hands of lone judge?

We need to lobby Congress to reform our laws in this regard.


10 posted on 03/25/2005 9:45:44 AM PST by steampower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson