Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Westpole

I agree, for the most part. I am afraid we will rue the day that some of us championed for the Fed. Gov. to get involved. This is a state issue. One that Florida needs to handle.


3 posted on 03/23/2005 10:52:53 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (Children need two-parent homes, hopefully the ones who actually made them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yellowdoghunter
I remember something in one of those federal documents 'LIFE, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness' How exactly is this not a federal issue?
9 posted on 03/23/2005 10:54:51 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yellowdoghunter

I'd agree if the Florida courts didn't have a history of rulings in violation of clearly written laws.


12 posted on 03/23/2005 10:55:56 AM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yellowdoghunter

Yep, Ike should have not gotten involved in integrating schools in Arkansas, after all it was a state issue. Bull Conner knew what was best for his state, after all.


23 posted on 03/23/2005 11:02:57 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yellowdoghunter
The legal implications of the Federal Terri Schiavo Law are enormous. In addition to all the litmus testing ramifications, the idea of Congress legislating judicial action is just as odious as the judiciary mandating executive or legislative action. It is a bad law, conceived in haste - an example of what the Founding Fathers warned against.
27 posted on 03/23/2005 11:03:49 AM PST by aQ_code_initiate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yellowdoghunter

Cases often go from state courts to federal courts - what's the difference?


33 posted on 03/23/2005 11:11:55 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yellowdoghunter

That's why the bill was written narrowly. If Congress doesn't want to get involved in another state issue, they aren't required to. Congressional bills aren't legal precedents.


47 posted on 03/23/2005 11:38:54 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson