The if they commit the sin of murder or pride or both their punishment will come from God and is of no concern to you.
I notice you say "medical person" and not doctor. Where did you attend medical school?
I've forgotten more about these subjects then you'll ever know you patronizing fool, both from school and experience.
And advocacy ends with the marriage. No "ex" has legal rights over a former spouse.
We live in a society that has constructed courts to handle these types of problems. We do not need to agree, but we need to abide by them. That is the social contract.
So you say that we have no concern with punshing murderers, since God will take care of them in the afterlife?
We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" ...It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany.
Secondly Florida Law states that a conflict of interest is grounds for removal of the guardian. It's obvious that MS is conflicted, the Florida Court of Appeals admitted as much in their holding.
And the notion that his testimony 8 years after the fact that TS had offered informed consent to be dehydrated to death is as laughable as the American system of jurisprudence has now become.