Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Here's some 80 year old work on speciation.
1 posted on 02/26/2005 3:20:34 PM PST by furball4paws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: furball4paws; PatrickHenry

Evolution ping


Let's get these out of the way now.

1. It's only a hybrid (BS!)
2. It's a Russian - you can't trust them.
3. It's a communist, atheist scientist plot to undermine America. (BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)
4. When I see a fish giving birth to a dog, I'll believe it.
5. It's all Bush's fault.


2 posted on 02/26/2005 3:23:22 PM PST by furball4paws (It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Unfortunately, the new species had the root of a cabbage and the leaf of a radish, and therefore had no commercial value.

I'm not fully convinced it would be much better the other way around.

4 posted on 02/26/2005 3:25:09 PM PST by glock rocks (WYGIWYG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Karpechenko witnessed the birth of a new species in the passage of only 3 plant generations. He named the new species Raphanobrassica. It was fully fertile and could not cross with either parent. Unfortunately, the new species had the root of a cabbage and the leaf of a radish, and therefore had no commercial value.

Thank you for posting this conclusive proof that evolution can only bring deterioration to what was previously good.

ONCE AGAIN CREATION IS PROVEN TRUE!!!

;-)

6 posted on 02/26/2005 3:27:51 PM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Debugging Windows Programs by McKay & Woodring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Here's some 80 year old work on speciation.

Which is curiously omitted in Coyne and Orr's Speciation (Published 2004).
I previously mentioned this book here

ML/NJ

15 posted on 02/26/2005 4:46:06 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws

Genesis 1 is much more friendly to the idea of plant evolution than it is animal/human evolution. God said "Let THE EARTH bring forth....(three main plant types in order of ascending complexity)". When the animals are created it says God MADE them, then it says He Created man. It seems like there was far less involvement in plants than people.


21 posted on 02/26/2005 7:05:15 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

"Unfortunately, the new species had the root of a cabbage and the leaf of a radish, and therefore had no commercial value."

Luckily, Lysenko showed how its cultivation range could be expanded indefinitely. ;')


32 posted on 02/27/2005 9:45:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, February 20, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Making Christians look stupid placemarker


33 posted on 02/28/2005 6:26:37 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
...some of the "sterile" hybrids produced a few viable seeds. These seeds were produced when the chromosome number spontaneously doubled. The doubling permitted the pairing of partner chromosomes and the formation of gametes with 1N=18.
Karpechenko witnessed the birth of a new species in the passage of only 3 plant generations.

'Yeah, but you still can't make a chicken out of an aardvark.'

Although data doesn't impress the creationists/ID, this little experiment is a slick demonstration of science at work.

35 posted on 03/01/2005 6:40:09 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Another "For Dummies" resource on polyploidy.

Speciation by Polyploidy.

Filed under Speciation: Can New Species Arise?

43 posted on 02/25/2006 2:56:03 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
I'm waiting for the viable mule of Heinlein's creation from "Time Enough for Love"
45 posted on 02/25/2006 3:34:29 PM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
“God shmod! I want my monkey-man!”
46 posted on 02/25/2006 3:38:54 PM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws

But corn still produces corn!!! HAHAHAHA!!! </YEC lunatic mode>


47 posted on 02/25/2006 4:06:01 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Unfortunately, the new species had the root of a cabbage and the leaf of a radish, and therefore had no commercial value.

If that's all evolution can do then the hell with it. We should have a committee formed to arrive at a consensus about what type of species we want.

48 posted on 02/25/2006 4:11:14 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
"Chromosomal Dissonance" would have been a more melodic title.
75 posted on 02/25/2006 7:36:39 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws
Get back to me when scientists can turn a radish into a horse and I might just believe evolution.
94 posted on 02/27/2006 12:37:53 PM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson