I'm real inclined to think the mom or the brother.
The brother might have just lost it after all the attention that got paid to Jon Benet, and the mom scribbles out the note as a cover.
So how do you account for the fact that Lee Hill, Leonard Peltier's lawyer, was manufacturing all kinds of false evidence about this case. His clients got in trouble for trying to influence a grand jury--and then he claimed they weren't his clients. He made a big production aobut this crazy woman from California who was making allegations about pedophile rings. He claimed the FBI failed to hide her from the pedophiles so he had to hide her with AIM.
But why is he telling the papers if she is really in danger???
You have to look at how what happened in Boulder is like what happened to the Indians at Pine Ridge. In Pine Ridge and Boulder people were fed conspiracy theories against the FBI.
The Indians were being told people were dying suspicious deaths and that the authorities (on the reservations it is the FBI that investigates serous crimes) were not investigating and were posibly complicit with the killers.
They got the idea for this fairy take from reading the FBI files on the Osage Indian Murders, except that the FBI really helped the Indians by catching and prosecuting the killer John Ramsey.
In Boulder people were told that the FBI and Boulder authorities were protecting a ring of pedophiles who were highly-placed. When there was no evidence of a ring of important pedophiles, this was seen as proof that the FBI was doing a cover-up. It is so stupid, like the Salem witch trials.
AIM always tries to make the FBI look like they are a pack of criminals instead of the pretty good, if not perfect, law enforcement organization they are.
Now that Ward Churchill has gone too far, people will start looking at who all these AIM folks are and how they are manipulating the media.